Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40269087›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Prediction and evaluation of environmental quality for nursing sow buildings via multisource sensor information fusion.

Chong Chen, Xingqiao Liu, Chaoji Liu, Chengyang Yu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Chong ChenYancheng Institute of Technology, Yancheng, 224051, China. cc082120@126.com.
Xingqiao LiuJiangsu University, Zhenjiang, 212013, China.
Chaoji LiuAnhui Science and Technology University, Bengbu, 233030, China.
Chengyang YuYancheng Institute of Technology, Yancheng, 224051, China.

Funding

Agricultural Science and Technology Independent Innovation Fund Project of Jiangsu Province CX(16)1006National Natural Science Foundation of China 31172243
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Environmental quality in nursing sow buildings has been a crucial determinant of the health and growth performance of piglets in large-scale pig production systems. Given that the environment within sow buildings comprises numerous interrelated factors, predicting and evaluating environmental comfort presents significant challenges. Consequently, accurate assessment of environmental quality and timely regulation of environmental conditions are essential, particularly for optimising breeding efficiency under minimal environmental stress. An analytical method was proposed using multivariate data fusion. The data repair, Grubbs criterion and a batch estimation adaptive weighted calculation method were employed to fuse the multiple sensor data, so as to eliminate abnormal values and redundant data. The Random Forest (RF) model was selected for the feature selection. There were six feature factors that were closely related to environmental quality, including temperature, relative humidity, concentrations of NH3, CO2,H

Indexed as

Animal HusbandryEnvironmental MonitoringHousing, AnimalAnimalsSwineTemperatureAdaptive MSCCSEnvironmental qualityLSSVRMKNursing sowsRF

Identifiers

PMID40269087
PMCPMC12019149

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.