Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40269086›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Enhancing xanthan hydrogels for water shutoff treatment in sandstone oil reservoirs through core flooding and CCD approach.

Raziyeh Dastjani-Farahani, Naser Asadzadeh, Arezou Jafari, Mohsen Vafaie-Sefti, Mahsa Baghban-Salehi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Raziyeh Dastjani-FarahaniFaculty of Chemical Engineering, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran.
Naser AsadzadehFaculty of Chemical Engineering, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran.
Arezou JafariFaculty of Chemical Engineering, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran. ajafari@modares.ac.ir.
Mohsen Vafaie-SeftiFaculty of Chemical Engineering, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran.
Mahsa Baghban-SalehiPetroleum Engineering Department, Chemistry & Chemical Engineering Research Center of Iran, Tehran, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study examines the efficacy of xanthan gum, as a natural polymer, in creating a suitable hydrogel for controlling water production in reservoirs. The study employed the Central Composite Design (CCD) method through bottle tests to evaluate the effect of different compounds on the gelation time and duration of syneresis. To explore the effectiveness of the xanthan-based hydrogels, swelling tests as well as dynamic core flooding tests are performed. Additionally, to enlighten the performance of the xanthan hydrogels, comprehensive set of characterization tests are performed. Nevertheless, the swelling test results indicated that increasing the polymer concentration led to an increase in swelling. SEM images of the dried hydrogel confirmed the structural integrity and uniformity of the networked architecture, demonstrating an increase in thickness and density. Furthermore, four hydrogel samples with the most appropriate specification in the bottle and swelling tests were chosen for core flooding tests. The results demonstrated that injecting the sample including; polymer@8000ppm, crosslinking agent ratio@0.15, and nanosilica@0.05 wt%, as an optimal sample, caused a 71.9% decrease in water production. Finally, the residual factor of 2.289, indicated the effective efficiency of xanthan-chromium hydrogel in the presence of nanosilica to reduce water permeability compared to oil in sandstone reservoir.

Indexed as

Central composite designCore floodingHydrogelsPermeability changesWater shut-off treatment

Identifiers

PMID40269086
PMCPMC12019567

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.