ArticleScientific reports2025
A robust and personalized privacy-preserving approach for adaptive clustered federated distillation.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Federated Learning in Healthcare: From Research to Real-World Deployment.Annual review of biomedical engineering · 2026Review
- IMFLKD: an incentive mechanism for decentralized federated learning based on knowledge distillation.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Biomedical data repositories require governance for artificial intelligence/machine learning applications at every step.JAMIA open · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Federated learning (FL) is a promising approach that addresses privacy, and scalability concerns in contrast to traditional centralized methods. Challenges such as personalization and data heterogeneity issues remain critical. Clustered federated learning (CFL) has been proposed as a promising approach to alleviate these issues by establishing specialized global models for sets of similar users. Although CFL enhances adaptability to highly statistically heterogeneous environments, it may suffer from real-time distribution changes due to limitations in fixed cluster configurations. This study presents the robust model of personalized federated distillation (RMPFD), a personalized and privacy-enhanced framework. The RMPFD framework employs an adaptive hierarchical clustering strategy to generate semi-global models by grouping clients with similar data distributions, allowing them to train independently. Meta-learning is used in each cluster to enhance the personalization of the local models and the classification accuracy of the non-independent and Identically distributed (non-IID) data distributions. Experimental evaluations conducted on CIFAR- 10, CIFAR- 100, Fashion-MNIST and Enron email datasets reveal that RMPFD reduces communication overhead by approximately 15% and 20%, compared to Federated Averaging (FedAvg) and other baseline techniques. Moreover, the RMPFD framework improves the convergence rates and classification accuracy, leading to an improvement of over 12% in performance compared to traditional FL methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.