ArticleScientific reports2025
Experimental observation of gray whale skull vibrations amplified in the bony hearing complex.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Validation of a computational model of bone conduction sound reception in mysticetes.PloS one · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Mysticete whales have bilateral bony ear complexes (tympanoperiotic complexes) that amplify low frequency vibrations in proximity to their vocalization ranges. Understanding the functional mechanics would enable precise predictions of mysticete hearing sensitivity, which is currently unknown. We conducted experiments on a juvenile and an adult gray whale skull from deceased animals to measure the vibrational dynamics between the tympanic bullae and the skull. Relative motions between bullae and skull indicate sound transfer to the inner ear. For the juvenile, assessments were performed on (1) a 3D-printed plastic skull-replica, (2) the original skull after much of the soft tissue had been removed by dissection, and (3) the denuded skull after hydrogen peroxide was used to erode the remaining soft tissues. We excited vibrations in the juvenile skull underwater by projecting sound in a test pool, ranging from 170-1000 Hz. Additionally, we measured in-air vibrations of the plastic, denuded, and adult skulls using a mechanical shaker to drive vibrations anteroposteriorly (rostrum-to-tail) from 150-1000 Hz. The results consistently showed amplification of vibrations at the tympanic bullae compared to the base of the skull, demonstrating a mechanism by which low-frequency sound is transferred from the environment, through the skull, to the inner ear.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.