Articlenpj aging2025
LinAge2: providing actionable insights and benchmarking with epigenetic clocks.
Article in npj aging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Epigenetic Clocks, Resilience, and Multi-Omics Ageing: A Review and the EpiAge-R Conceptual Framework.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Reframing biological age as risk-equivalent age.Nature aging · 2026Article
- Do we actually need aging clocks?npj aging · 2025Review
- A sex-adjusted 7-biomarker clinical aging clock for translational preventative medicine.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Biological aging is marked by a decline in resilience at the cellular and systemic levels, driving an exponential increase in mortality risk. Here, we evaluate several clinical and epigenetic clocks for their ability to predict mortality, demonstrating that clocks trained on survival and functional aging outperform those trained on chronological age. We present an enhanced clinical clock that predicts mortality more accurately and provides actionable insights for guiding personalized interventions. These findings highlight the potential of mortality-predicting clocks to inform clinical decision-making and promote strategies for healthy longevity.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.