Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40268939›Full record

ArticleNPJ science of food2025

Defining the role of processing in food classification systems-the IUFoST formulation & processing approach.

Lilia Ahrné, Hongda Chen, Christiani J Henry, Hyun-Sook Kim, Barbara Schneeman, Erich J Windhab

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ science of food, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Lilia AhrnéDepartment of Food Science, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Hongda ChenNational Institute of Food and Agriculture (NIFA), USDA, Washington, DC, USA.
Christiani J HenrySingapore Institute of Food Biotechnology Innovation (SIFBI, Singapore, Singapore.
Hyun-Sook KimDepartment of Food and Nutrition, Sookmyung Women's University, Seoul, Korea.
Barbara SchneemanFood Science and Nutrition, UC Davis, Davis, CA, USA.
Erich J WindhabInstitute of Food, Nutrition and Health, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zürich (ETH), Zürich, Switzerland. erich.windhab@hest.ethz.ch.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Task Force on Food Processing for Nutrition, Diet and Health established by the International Union of Food Science and Technology (IUFoST) has developed a rational approach to determine the impact of food processing on the nutritional value of processed foods, called the IUFoST Formulation and Processing Classification (IF&PC) scheme which is comprehensively reported here. The purpose of developing this scheme is (A) to address the current confusion between formulation and processing and thereby offer assistance to improve and refine the controversial NOVA classification system, and (B) to explore the potential for considering other relevant essential food attributes, such as (a) safety, (b) sustainability, (c) palatability, (d) affordability, and (e) convenience in food product classification. The authors recommend that this IUFoST initiative be further investigated and complemented based on concerted R&D interactions of food scientists, food engineers, and nutritionists.

Identifiers

PMID40268939
PMCPMC12019408

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.