ArticleTranslational stroke research2025
Proteomic and Demographic Comparisons of Recurrent Ischemic Stroke Patients.
Article in Translational stroke research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Rates of recurrent strokes have remained relatively unchanged over the past couple decades, highlighting a need for advancements in secondary prevention of stroke recurrence. This study utilizes the Blood And Clot Thrombectomy Registry And Collaboration (BACTRAC) tissue bank to identify proteomic and demographic differences in recurrent ischemic stroke patients. Blood samples were collected during mechanical thrombectomy of large-vessel occlusion ischemic strokes. Plasma levels for 184 inflammatory and cardiometabolic proteins were measured in systemic blood and intracranial blood from the infarction area. Differences between recurrent and first-stroke patients were analyzed using Fisher's Exact Test for categorical variables and Student's independent samples t tests or Welch's t tests for continuous variables. Proteins were divided into systemic and intracranial proteins, and independent samples t tests were performed with a False Discovery Rate of 5.0%. Significant variables were used in multiple logistic regression. There were 20 patients in the prior stroke group and 121 in the first stroke group. The prior stroke group had a significantly higher percentage of females (80.0% vs 50.4%, p = 0.016) and lower rate of hyperlipidemia comorbidity (10.5% vs 35.5%, p = 0.034). Two systemic proteins were significantly higher in those with a prior stroke: CCL14 and FGF-19. Multiple logistic regression found higher levels of CCL14 and FGF-19 to be predictive of a stroke being recurrent. Along with other demographics, these proteins could provide a predictive model to identify patients with risk of recurrent ischemic strokes. Serum CCL14 and FGF-19 levels are easily accessible biomarkers, making them possible therapeutic targets for recurrent stroke prevention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.