ReviewHeart failure reviews2025
SEISMIC-HF 1: key findings from AHA24 and implications for remote cardiac monitoring.
Review in Heart failure reviews, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical Readiness of Hemodynamic Estimation from Cardiac Vibration Signals: An Endpoint-Specific Critical Review.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2026Review
- Innovative strategies to reduce heart failure hospitalizations: insights from the ESC heart failure congress 2026.Heart failure reviews · 2026Review
- Article
- Machine-Learning-Driven Phenotyping in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction: Current Approaches and Future Directions.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
While there is continued progress in developing therapies for patients with heart failure, the condition results in significant morbidity and a sizeable economic impact on our society. Recent advances in wearable sensors combined with machine learning algorithms give hope that heart failure can be better managed remotely and allow for improved clinical outcomes. This is a focused review of the key findings of the SEISMocardiogram In Cardiovascular Monitoring for Heart Failure I (SEISMIC-HF 1) study, presented at the American Heart Association's Scientific Sessions 2024 in Chicago, Illinois. This study showcased the ability of a machine learning algorithm to estimate pulmonary capillary wedge pressure in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, utilizing seismocardiography, photoplethysmography, and electrocardiography signals obtained non-invasively through a wearable sensor patch (CardioTag) for model input. The authors showed a significant correlation between model-predicted pulmonary capillary wedge pressure and the gold standard pressure measurement obtained from right heart catheterization. Future investigations should assess the implementation of this technology as a part of a treatment strategy for outpatient heart failure care and explore its performance in additional study populations including those with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction and in patients outside of the clinical environment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.