ArticleThe journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research2025
Retrospective analysis of treatment and prognosis for clear cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix: 15-year experience at a single institution.
Article in The journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced clear cell carcinoma of the cervix leading to complete disease resolution; a case report.Gynecologic oncology reports · 2026Article
- Long-Term Tumor Control After Carbon Ion Radiation Therapy Boost in Locally Advanced Cervical Clear Cell Adenocarcinoma.International journal of particle therapy · 2025Article
- Retrospective analysis of treatment and prognosis for clear cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix: 15-year experience at a single institution.The journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimClear cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix (CCCUC) is a rare disease, accounting for 4% to 9% of cervical adenocarcinomas. Because it is so rare, its pathogenesis is largely unknown, and the standard treatment is unclear due to a lack of prospective studies. Our aim is to investigate the clinical features, treatment, and prognosis of CCCUC.
methodsWe retrospectively evaluated the clinical characteristics, treatment choices, and outcomes of 12 patients with CCCUC treated at our institution between January 2009 and July 2024.
resultsThe median patient age was 62.5 years (range, 14-90 years). The most common stage was IB (IA, n = 3; IB, n = 4; IIB, n = 1; IIIC, n = 2; IVB, n = 2). Ten patients underwent surgery as initial treatment: 6 underwent radical hysterectomy plus pelvic lymphadenectomy (PLD) or sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB), with or without para-aortic lymphadenectomy (PALD); 3 underwent modified radical hysterectomy plus PLD with or without PALD; and 1 underwent radical trachelectomy with SLNB as fertility-preserving surgery. All patients underwent bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy except for the patient who opted for radical trachelectomy. Five patients received adjuvant treatment: 3 received platinum-based systemic chemotherapy (2 of whom had combination therapy with bevacizumab), and 2 received concurrent chemoradiotherapy. The median follow-up was 43.5 months (range, 1-123 months). The 5-year progression-free survival rate was 64.5%.
conclusionSystemic platinum-based chemotherapy with bevacizumab may be more effective than concurrent chemoradiotherapy as adjuvant therapy for CCCUC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.