ArticleZeitschrift fur medizinische Physik2026
Can multiparametric FDG-PET/MRI analysis really enhance the prediction of myocardial recovery after CTO revascularization? A machine learning study.
Article in Zeitschrift fur medizinische Physik, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo comprehensively evaluate the effectiveness of FDG-PET/MRI multiparametric analysis in predicting myocardial wall motion recovery following revascularization of chronic coronary total occlusions (CTO), incorporating both traditional and machine learning approaches.
methodsThis retrospective study assessed fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose uptake (FDG), late gadolinium enhanced MR imaging (LGE), and MR wall motion abnormalities (WMA) of the left ventricle walls of a clinical cohort with 21 CTO patients (62 ± 9 years, 20 men). All patients were examined using a PET/MRI prior to revascularization and a follow-up cardiac MRI six months later. Prediction models for wall motion recovery after perfusion restoration were developed using linear and nonlinear algorithms as well as multiparametric variables. Performance and prediction explainability were evaluated in a 5x2 cross-validation framework, using ROC AUC and McNemar's test modified for clustered matched-pair data, and Shapley values.
resultsBased on 79 CTO-subtended myocardial wall segments with wall motion abnormalities at baseline, the reference logistic regression model LGE + FDG obtained 0.55(SE = 0.07) in the clustered ROC AUC (cROC AUC) and 0.17(0.05) in the Global Absolute Shapley value. The reference outperformed FDG standalone in cROC AUC (-35(17) %, p < 0.0001), but not LGE standalone (11(12) %, p > 0.05). There were no statistically significant differences between the marginal probabilities of success of these three models. Moreover, no significant improvements (differences < 10 % in cROC AUC, and < 20 % in Global Absolute Shapley, p > 0.05) were found when using mixed effects logistic regression, decision tree, k-nearest neighbor, Naive Bayes, random forest, and support vector machine, with multiparametric combinations of FDG, LGE, and/or WMA.
conclusionIn this clinical cohort, adding more complex interactions between PET/MRI imaging of cardiac function, infarct extension, and/or metabolism did not enhance the prediction of wall motion recovery after perfusion restoration. This finding raises the question whether multiparametric FDG-PET/MRI analysis has demonstrable benefits in risk stratification for CTO revascularization. Further studies with larger cohorts and external validation datasets are crucial to clarify this question and refine the role of multiparametric imaging in this context.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.