ArticleInternational journal of cancer2025
Real-world comparative effectiveness and safety of Pertuzumab in patients with HER2+ metastatic breast cancer: A pan-Canadian population-based cohort study.
Article in International journal of cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Real-World Evidence for Drug Value Assessment in China: Learning from International Experiences.Drugs - real world outcomes · 2026Article
- Real-world comparative effectiveness and safety of Pertuzumab in patients with HER2+ metastatic breast cancer: A pan-Canadian population-based cohort study.International journal of cancer · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
32 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We assessed the comparative effectiveness and safety of pertuzumab plus trastuzumab and chemotherapy versus trastuzumab and chemotherapy for patients with HER2+ metastatic breast cancer (mBC) in Canada. We conducted a population-based retrospective study of patients receiving first-line treatment for mBC across eight Canadian provinces. Patients receiving trastuzumab and chemotherapy were historical comparators, and patients receiving pertuzumab plus trastuzumab and chemotherapy were the treatment group. Patients were followed until death or up to 5 years following the start of treatment (maximum follow-up to December 31, 2019). The primary outcome was overall survival (OS). One-year cumulative incidence and RDs were calculated for safety outcomes including hospitalization, emergency department visits, febrile neutropenia, and cardiac-related events. Propensity score matching (PSM) and inverse-probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) were applied within provinces. Individual provincial survival estimates were pooled using random effects meta-analysis. 3063 patients who received first-line treatment for mBC were identified. Median OS was higher among treatment patients compared to comparator patients in most provinces. Pertuzumab was associated with a statistically significantly lower risk of mortality (pooled HRs, PSM: 0.65, 95%CI: 0.57-0.74; IPTW: 0.65, 95% CI: 0.61-0.70). The treatment group had a lower risk of hospitalization compared to the comparator group (pooled RD: -0.05, 95% CI: [-0.09]-[-0.01]). No difference in 1-year cumulative incidence of cardiac-related events was identified between groups. Pertuzumab use in practice was associated with statistically significant improved survival without apparent safety concerns among patients with mBC. Real-world evaluations allow for assessments of publicly funded treatments to inform funding policies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.