ArticleBMJ open2025
Safety and effectiveness of modified laparoscopic transcystic biliary drainage in the treatment of choledocholithiasis: study protocol for a prospective single-arm clinical trial.
Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06011941 (Safety and Feasibility of Modified Laparoscopic Transcystic Biliary Drainage in the Management of Cholecystocholedocholithiasis), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Safety and Feasibility of Modified Laparoscopic Transcystic Biliary Drainage in the Management of Cholecystocholedocholithiasis
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionSeveral techniques are used for laparoscopic treatment of gallstone disease with biliary duct stone, but each approach has indications and shortcomings. We have developed a modified laparoscopic transcystic biliary drainage for the management of cholecysto-choledocholithiasis. The hypothesis is that the modified laparoscopic transcystic biliary drainage will reduce morbidity from around 15% to less than 5%. The aim of this study is to assess the safety and efficacy of the modified laparoscopic transcystic biliary drainage. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a prospective single-arm clinical trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the modified laparoscopic transcystic biliary drainage. The recruited 310 patients will be from Peking University Third Hospital. (Here, patients who meet the inclusion criteria will be included in the study, all patients will undergo laparoscopic cholecystectomy with concomitant laparoscopic exploration of the common bile duct and a modified laparoscopic transcystic drainage.) The primary endpoint is the postoperative morbidity and bile leakage. The secondary endpoints of the study are anchoring time of the C-tube, average daily drainage volume, early dislodgement of the C-tube, removal time of the C-tube, pancreatitis, residual stones and postoperative hospital stay. Recurrent stones and biliary stricture will be recorded during 6 months of follow-up. A two-tailed p<0.05 was considered statistically significant. SPSS for Windows V.21.0 (SPSS) software was used. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This clinical trial was approved by the Medical Science Research Ethics Committee of Peking University Third Hospital (No. M2023223). TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT06011941. PROTOCOL VERSION: V.2, 23 November 2023.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.