ArticleBone & joint open2025
Deployment of real-time particle detection monitoring system in operating theatres for airborne contamination assessments : a methodological evaluation.
Article in Bone & joint open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aims: Surgical site infections (SSIs) are a major complication of orthopaedic implant surgeries, causing patient morbidity and reduced quality of life, and represent a substantial economic burden. Current methods for monitoring airborne contamination in operating theatres (OTs) are labour-intensive and delayed, limiting timely preventive actions. Advanced real-time monitoring technologies offer potential for improving infection control in surgical settings. This study evaluated real-time monitoring for airborne contamination; two scenarios were analyzed with the developed system: 1) the use of reusable non-disposable versus disposable surgical sheets; and 2) surgical team shift changes. SSI outcomes were also evaluated in relation to elevated particle levels. Methods: This study was conducted in four OTs at Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Sweden. Particle counters were employed in each OT for detection of airborne contamination for continuous surveillance. SSIs leading to reoperations were extracted from national registries and integrated into the analysis. Results: The use of reusable surgical sheets significantly reduced airborne particle concentrations across all sizes (0.5, 1, 5, and 10 µm; p = 0.022, p = 0.004, p = 0.009, and p = 0.015, respectively) compared with single-use sheets. Team shift changes were associated with increased airborne particle levels for 0.5, 1, and 5.0 µm (p = 0.001, p = 0.004, and p = 0.009, respectively). While smaller particle concentrations showed no consistent association with SSIs, larger particles (10 µm) were significantly elevated in SSI cases (p = 0.005 for maximum values and p = 0.009 for mean values). Conclusion: Real-time monitoring systems proved effective in identifying factors influencing airborne contamination in OTs. Notably, non-disposable sheets outperformed disposable sheets in minimizing particulate dispersion, and surgical events with team shift changes showed an increase in maximum particle levels. Although the system shows promise for infection prevention and workflow optimization, its direct impact on SSI rates requires validation in larger cohorts. Future research should focus on integrating predictive algorithms and machine-learning to enhance clinical utility and drive improvements in surgical safety.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.