Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40268292›Full record

Trial reportAllergy2025

Oral Immunotherapy in Peanut-Allergic Adults Using Real-World Materials.

Hannah Hunter, Kok Loong Ue, Victoria Cornelius, Ching Ching Yung, Iason Thomas, Olympia Tsilochristou, Janice Layhadi, Leonard Q C Siew, Carina Venter, Mohamed H Shamji and 1 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Allergy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03648320 (A Single Arm Phase II Efficacy Study of Peanut Oral Immunotherapy in Adults), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03648320 nacompletednot on this map

A Single Arm Phase II Efficacy Study of Peanut Oral Immunotherapy in Adults

TypeinterventionalSponsorGuy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation TrustRan2018 to 2022Enrolled33ConditionsPeanut AllergyArmsPeanut oral immunotherapy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Hannah HunterGuy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7755-2626
Kok Loong UeGuy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Victoria CorneliusImperial Clinical Trials Unit, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Ching Ching YungGuy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Iason ThomasGuy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3698-1966
Olympia TsilochristouGuy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Janice LayhadiNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Leonard Q C SiewGuy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3656-939X
Carina VenterSection of Allergy and Immunology, University of Colorado, Denver, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7473-5355
Mohamed H ShamjiNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3425-3463
Stephen J TillGuy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.

Funding

NIHR Research for Patient Benefit program PB-PG-1215-20006
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPeanut oral immunotherapy (OIT) has shown effectiveness in achieving desensitization of children; however, evidence in adults is lacking.

methodsThis phase II trial evaluated peanut OIT in peanut-allergic adults using real-world peanut products. A Simon's minimax two-stage design, incorporating a stop:go for futility, was employed. A separate untreated control group was also recruited for comparison of mechanistic parameters. Participants underwent baseline double-blind placebo-control food challenges (DBPCFC) with peanut protein doses of 0.3 to 300 mg. Reacting participants were initiated on daily OIT with 2-weekly updosing until reaching a maintenance dose of 1000 mg (four large peanuts). The primary outcome was the proportion of OIT participants who tolerated a cumulative dose of 1.4 g peanut protein during exit DBPCFC (doses provided 0.3-3000 mg).

resultsTwenty-one adults (8 female; mean age 24.2 years [SD 4.9]) were enrolled in the OIT group, with 67% achieving the daily maintenance dose and meeting the primary endpoint. Three withdrew due to adverse reactions, and a further three did not complete the trial for reasons unrelated to OIT. The median tolerated dose increased from 30 mg (equivalent to approximately 1/8th of a peanut) to 3000 mg (12 peanuts) at the exit challenge, representing a 100-fold increase (p < 0.0001). OIT was associated with an improvement in QoL measures. Suppression of peanut skin prick test sizes and induction of peanut-specific IgG were observed in OIT but not in control participants.

conclusionsPeanut OIT appears to be an efficacious treatment for adults with peanut allergy. Further studies are needed for confirmation and to characterize safety profiles in different adult subgroups.

trial registrationGrown Up Peanut Immunotherapy (GUPI) study; ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03648320.

Indexed as

AllergensDesensitization, ImmunologicPeanut HypersensitivityAdministration, OralAdolescentAdultArachisFemaleHumansMaleTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultAllergensallergy treamentdesensitisationfood allergyimmunotherapy and tolerance inductionpeanutquality‐of‐life

Identifiers

PMID40268292
PMCPMC12368739

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.