Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40268204›Full record

ReviewArchivos de cardiologia de Mexico2025

[Clinical application of the 4D flow sequence in cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. Practical examples].

Andrea Salas-Mier, Laura V Torres-Araujo, Moisés Jiménez-Santos, Ana M Rosas-Vázquez, Jorge A Silva-Estrada, Edgar García-Cruz, Julieta Rancati

Abstract readCase ReportsEnglish AbstractReview
In one paragraph

Review in Archivos de cardiologia de Mexico, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Andrea Salas-MierDepartamento de Imagen Cardiovascular, Grupo CT Scanner, Centro de Diagnóstico por Imagen, Lomas Altas, Ciudad de México, México.
Laura V Torres-AraujoDepartamento de Imagen Cardiovascular, Grupo CT Scanner, Centro de Diagnóstico por Imagen, Lomas Altas, Ciudad de México, México.
Moisés Jiménez-SantosDepartamento de Imagen Cardiovascular, Grupo CT Scanner, Centro de Diagnóstico por Imagen, Lomas Altas, Ciudad de México, México.
Ana M Rosas-VázquezDepartamento de Imagen Cardiovascular, Grupo CT Scanner, Centro de Diagnóstico por Imagen, Lomas Altas, Ciudad de México, México.
Jorge A Silva-EstradaDepartamento de Imagen Cardiovascular, Grupo CT Scanner, Centro de Diagnóstico por Imagen, Lomas Altas, Ciudad de México, México.
Edgar García-CruzCardiología Pediátrica, Instituto Nacional de Pediatría, Coyoacán, Ciudad de México, México.
Julieta RancatiCardiología Pediátrica, Hospital de Pediatría Pedro Elizalde, Buenos Aires, Argentina.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Part of the complexity of heart and large vessels flows analysis in cardiac magnetic resonance relies in its variability over time and multiple directions, so the analysis using two-dimensional phase contrast sequences requires time for planning and acquiring multiple sequences, which increases significantly the study time. The 4D flow sequence in cardiac magnetic resonance is a technique that allows a comprehensive and precise assessment of these flows in a single free breathing acquisition, characteristic that are particularly useful in the study of congenital heart disease. We present three cases of patients with simple and complex congenital heart diseases, where the usefulness of this technique is illustrated.

Indexed as

Heart Defects, CongenitalMagnetic Resonance ImagingAdultFemaleHumansMaleCardiac magnetic resonance imaging. 4D flow. Congenital heart disease.

Identifiers

PMID40268204
PMCPMC12324834

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.