ArticleJournal of sleep research2026
Does It Matter What Keeps You Awake? Effects of Two Different Sleep Deprivation Methods on Object-Location Memory and Hippocampal c-Fos Expression in Mice.
Article in Journal of sleep research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Microglial response to sleep deprivation depends on the hippocampal region and paradigm used in adult male mice.Brain, behavior, & immunity - health · 2026Article
- Repeated sleep deprivation selectively reactivates hippocampal CA1 pyramidal neurons.Molecular brain · 2026Article
- Does It Matter What Keeps You Awake? Effects of Two Different Sleep Deprivation Methods on Object-Location Memory and Hippocampal c-Fos Expression in Mice.Journal of sleep research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In sleep research, various sleep deprivation methods have been used to examine the effects of sleep loss on memory. However, studies often overlook the distinct impacts each method may have on activity in specific neuronal circuits and memory storage. It remains unclear whether these changes following sleep deprivation result from extended wakefulness alone or from an interaction with the nature of the waking experience. To address this question, we examined how two commonly used sleep deprivation methods in mice-gentle handling and novelty-induced sleep deprivation-affect object-location memory and hippocampal c-Fos expression. Using either method, mice were sleep deprived for 3 or 6 h immediately after training in the object-location memory task, and spatial memory performance was assessed 1 day after training. Object-location memory was impaired after 3 and 6 h of novelty-induced sleep deprivation, but only after 6 h of sleep deprivation by gentle handling. Assessing c-Fos expression in separate groups of mice immediately after 3 or 6 h of sleep deprivation showed that both methods increased c-Fos expression in the CA1 and CA3 regions after 3 h of sleep deprivation, while effects in the dentate gyrus depended on the method and blade examined. After 6 h of sleep deprivation, no significant changes in hippocampal c-Fos expression were observed regardless of the method used. Overall, our findings show that the type of experience mice have while being kept awake and the duration of sleep deprivation can have different effects on spatial memory and neuronal activity in hippocampal subregions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.