Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40267970›Full record

ArticleNature medicine2025

Benchmark evaluation of DeepSeek large language models in clinical decision-making.

Sarah Sandmann, Stefan Hegselmann, Michael Fujarski, Lucas Bickmann, Benjamin Wild, Roland Eils, Julian Varghese

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 132 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
132citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

132 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

72 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sarah SandmannInstitute of Medical Informatics, University of Münster, Münster, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5011-0641
Stefan HegselmannCenter for Digital Health, Berlin Institute of Health, Charité - University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2145-3258
Michael FujarskiInstitute of Medical Informatics, University of Münster, Münster, Germany.
Lucas BickmannInstitute of Medical Informatics, University of Münster, Münster, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9043-7844
Benjamin WildCenter for Digital Health, Berlin Institute of Health, Charité - University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7492-8448
Roland EilsCenter for Digital Health, Berlin Institute of Health, Charité - University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany. roland_eils@fudan.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0034-4036
Julian VargheseInstitute of Medical Data Science, Otto-von-Guericke University, Magdeburg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7206-3719

Funding

Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (Federal Ministry of Education and Research) 01KX2121Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (German Research Foundation) SFB 1470National Natural Science Foundation of China (National Science Foundation of China) W2441025
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly transforming medical applications. However, proprietary models such as GPT-4o face significant barriers to clinical adoption because they cannot be deployed on site within healthcare institutions, making them noncompliant with stringent privacy regulations. Recent advancements in open-source LLMs such as DeepSeek models offer a promising alternative because they allow efficient fine-tuning on local data in hospitals with advanced information technology infrastructure. Here, to demonstrate the clinical utility of DeepSeek-V3 and DeepSeek-R1, we benchmarked their performance on clinical decision support tasks against proprietary LLMs, including GPT-4o and Gemini-2.0 Flash Thinking Experimental. Using 125 patient cases with sufficient statistical power, covering a broad range of frequent and rare diseases, we found that DeepSeek models perform equally well and in some cases better than proprietary LLMs. Our study demonstrates that open-source LLMs can provide a scalable pathway for secure model training enabling real-world medical applications in accordance with data privacy and healthcare regulations.

Indexed as

BenchmarkingClinical Decision-MakingDecision Support Systems, ClinicalHumansLarge Language Models

Identifiers

PMID40267970
PMCPMC12353792

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.