Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40267962›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of dentistry2025

The Influence of Different Implant Placement Techniques on Alveolar Ridge Preservation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Nguyen Phu Thang, Nguyen Thi Khanh Ly, Do Thi Thanh Toan, Nguyen Thu Tra, Nguyen Minh Duc

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of dentistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Nguyen Phu ThangDepartment of Oral Surgery, School of Dentistry, Hanoi Medical University, Hanoi, Vietnam.
Nguyen Thi Khanh LyDepartment of Oral Surgery, School of Dentistry, Hanoi Medical University, Hanoi, Vietnam.
Do Thi Thanh ToanDepartment of Medical Statistics and Informatics, Institute for Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Hanoi Medical University, Hanoi, Vietnam.
Nguyen Thu TraDepartment of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Hanoi Medical University, Hanoi, Vietnam.
Nguyen Minh DucDepartment of Oral Surgery, School of Dentistry, Hanoi Medical University, Hanoi, Vietnam.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This systematic review and meta-analysis compares the effectiveness of three implant placement techniques: socket shield technique (SST), conventional immediate implant placement (CIIP), and delayed implant placement (DIP) in alveolar ridge preservation, implant survival rates, and esthetics. A comprehensive search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library, covering studies from 2012 to 2022. Inclusion criteria targeted clinical studies with a minimum follow-up of 6 months. Risk of bias was assessed using RoB-2 and ROBINS-I tools, and meta-analyses were performed using random-effects models. Sixteen studies met the inclusion criteria. SST demonstrated significantly better preservation of buccal bone thickness (standardized mean difference [SMD] = 2.94, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.46-4.42,

Identifiers

PMID40267962
PMCPMC12494416

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.