ArticleEuropean journal of dentistry2026
Implementation of the 2018 Classification of Periodontal Diseases: A Questionnaire-Based Survey.
Article in European journal of dentistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The new classification of periodontal and peri-implant diseases and conditions (2018) includes definitions of the respective diseases, modifications, and new additions to the 1999 classification. The purpose of the study was to present the opinion and level of understanding of Greek dentists regarding the new classification and to determine the approach for its establishment.A questionnaire consisting of 26 multiple-choice questions was distributed to Greek dentists in paper or digital form.Data were collected, recorded using Microsoft Excel, and were analyzed with SPSS 29.0 (IBM, United States).A total of 203 questionnaires were collected (49.3% male/50.2% female; mean age 39.02 years). 36.8% of the participants exclusively practiced periodontology and 44.8% general dentistry. Seventy-one participants were members of the Hellenic Society of Periodontology (HSP). 58.9% used the old classification system, which is reported as preferred by 53.5% of HSP members. Also, 53.3% of participants characterized the new classification as difficult to be applied, 47.1% of whom were HSP members. The most frequent reason for not using it (63/133) was the convenience of the older system application. A statistically significant higher percentage of HSP members correctly answered the comprehension questions (diagnostic criteria and clinical cases) of the questionnaire (
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.