ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2025
Prediction of Reactivation After Antivascular Endothelial Growth Factor Monotherapy for Retinopathy of Prematurity: Multimodal Machine Learning Model Study.
Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prediction Models for Recurrence of Retinopathy of Prematurity after Intravitreal Ranibizumab or Laser Photocoagulation Treatment: A Multicenter Cohort Study.Ophthalmology and therapy · 2026Article
- Modelling direct healthcare costs for screening and treatment of retinopathy of prematurity among infants born at gestational age <24 weeks: findings from a Swedish cohort.BMJ open ophthalmology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRetinopathy of prematurity (ROP) is the leading preventable cause of childhood blindness. A timely intravitreal injection of antivascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) is required to prevent retinal detachment with consequent vision impairment and loss. However, anti-VEGF has been reported to be associated with ROP reactivation. Therefore, an accurate prediction of reactivation after treatment is urgently needed.
objectiveTo develop and validate prediction models for reactivation after anti-VEGF intravitreal injection in infants with ROP using multimodal machine learning algorithms.
methodsInfants with ROP undergoing anti-VEGF treatment were recruited from 3 hospitals, and conventional machine learning, deep learning, and fusion models were constructed. The areas under the curve (AUCs), accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity were used to show the performances of the prediction models.
resultsA total of 239 cases with anti-VEGF treatment were recruited, including 90 (37.66%) with reactivation and 149 (62.34%) nonreactivation cases. The AUCs for the conventional machine learning model were 0.806 and 0.805 in the internal validation and test groups, respectively. The average AUC, sensitivity, and specificity in the test for the deep learning model were 0.787, 0.800, and 0.570, respectively. The specificity, AUC, and sensitivity for the fusion model were 0.686, 0.822, and 0.800 in a test, separately.
conclusionsWe constructed 3 prediction models for ROP reactivation. The fusion model achieved the best performance. Using this prediction model, we could optimize strategies for treating ROP in infants and develop better screening plans after treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.