Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40267357›Full record

ArticleSalud colectiva2025

[Pharmaceutical subjectivity in times of crisis in Madrid: Between survival, chronicity, and "It Must Be Me"].

María Reneses

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Salud colectiva, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

María RenesesPhD in Anthropology. Postdoctoral researcher. Institute of Technological Research, School of Engineering (ICAI), Faculty of Human and Social Sciences, Universidad Pontificia Comillas, Madrid, Spain. mreneses@comillas.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-9708-6896

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent years, mental health has gained significant relevance, accompanied by a gradual reduction in stigma. As a result, more people are understanding and analyzing their suffering in psychological terms. However, for many individuals accessing public mental health services in a city like Madrid, medication remains the primary treatment option. This study aims to analyze the type of subjectivity produced through this form of intervention, based on the findings of an ethnographic research conducted between 2012 and 2014. The research included observation in mental health center consultations, 19 in-depth interviews with psychotropic drug users, and a reflection group with periodic meetings. Key findings highlight ambivalence towards medication and the need for continuous adjustments to minimize side effects. The resulting subjectivity revolves around central aspects such as the fear of relapse and side effects; autonomy, which conflicts with the notion of not trying on one's own; accountability, feelings of vulnerability and self-governance, core aspects of neoliberal subjectivity.

Indexed as

Mental DisordersPsychotropic DrugsAdultAnthropology, CulturalFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPersonal AutonomySocial StigmaSpainPsychotropic DrugsMental HealthMetabolic Side Effects of Drugs and SubstancesPsychotropic DrugsSpain

Identifiers

PMID40267357
PMCPMC12303866

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.