ArticleDiabetes care2025
Lipidomic Markers of Processed Meat and Unprocessed Red Meat Intake and Risk of Diabetes in American Indians.
Article in Diabetes care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Lipidomic Markers of Tobacco Use and Cessation Associated With Cardiovascular Risk Factors: A Longitudinal Study in American Indian Individuals.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2026Article
- Revisiting the Link Between Meat Intake and the Risk of Type 2 Diabetes in American Indians: Insights Based on Lipidomic Profiles.Diabetes care · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo identify lipidomic markers of habitual unprocessed red meat and processed meat intake and evaluate their associations with diabetes risk in American Indians. RESEARCH DESIGN AND
methodsWe studied 1,816 participants from the Strong Heart Family Study. Using untargeted liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry, we quantified 1,542 lipids (518 known) in fasting plasma at baseline and follow-up (∼5 years apart). Meat intake was assessed via Food Frequency Questionnaires. Mixed-effects linear regression was used to identify lipids associated with meat consumption. Mixed-effects logistic regression was used to examine whether these lipids were associated with incident diabetes, independent of conventional risk factors, or with longitudinal glucose/insulin metrics.
resultsDiabetes developed in 66 of 1,076 participants with normal baseline glucose. After multiple testing correction, 15 known lipids, primarily plasmalogens, were associated with unprocessed red meat intake. Three plasmalogens were linked to incident diabetes (odds ratio [OR] 1.32 [95% CI 1.02-1.70] to 1.39 [1.08-1.78] per SD increase in baseline levels) and higher red meat intake. Eight lipids, mainly sphingomyelins, were associated with processed meat intake. Two sphingomyelins were linked to incident diabetes (OR 1.33 [95% CI 1.02-1.75] and 1.36 [1.04-1.80]) and higher processed meat intake. Of 23 meat-related lipids, 20 were associated with altered glucose/insulin metrics, and 11 mediated positive associations between red or processed meat intake and fasting glucose.
conclusionsWe identified lipidomic markers of unprocessed red and processed meat consumption. Several lipids were independently associated with increased diabetes risk, potentially by mediating the association between meat intake and glucose metabolism.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.