Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40267259›Full record

ArticleJournal of radiation research2025

Improvement of deep learning-based dose conversion accuracy to a Monte Carlo algorithm in proton beam therapy for head and neck cancers.

Ryohei Kato, Noriyuki Kadoya, Takahiro Kato, Ryota Tozuka, Shuta Ogawa, Masao Murakami, Keiichi Jingu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of radiation research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ryohei KatoDepartment of Radiation Physics and Technology, Southern Tohoku Proton Therapy Center, 7-172 Yatsuyamada, Koriyama, Fukushima, 963-8052, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-0104-9696
Noriyuki KadoyaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-1 Seiryou-machi, Aoba-ku, Sendai, Miyagi, 980-8574, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-5018-3800
Takahiro KatoDepartment of Radiological Sciences, School of Health Sciences, Fukushima Medical University, 10-6 Sakaemachi, Fukushima, Fukushima, 960-8516, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-8343-8037
Ryota TozukaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-1 Seiryou-machi, Aoba-ku, Sendai, Miyagi, 980-8574, Japan.
Shuta OgawaDepartment of Radiation Physics and Technology, Southern Tohoku Proton Therapy Center, 7-172 Yatsuyamada, Koriyama, Fukushima, 963-8052, Japan.
Masao MurakamiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Southern Tohoku Proton Therapy Center, 7-172 Yatsuyamada, Koriyama, Fukushima, 963-8052, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-9530-0337
Keiichi JinguDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-1 Seiryou-machi, Aoba-ku, Sendai, Miyagi, 980-8574, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-7032-1577

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study is aimed to clarify the effectiveness of the image-rotation technique and zooming augmentation to improve the accuracy of the deep learning (DL)-based dose conversion from pencil beam (PB) to Monte Carlo (MC) in proton beam therapy (PBT). We adapted 85 patients with head and neck cancers. The patient dataset was randomly divided into 101 plans (334 beams) for training/validation and 11 plans (34 beams) for testing. Further, we trained a DL model that inputs a computed tomography (CT) image and the PB dose in a single-proton field and outputs the MC dose, applying the image-rotation technique and zooming augmentation. We evaluated the DL-based dose conversion accuracy in a single-proton field. The average γ-passing rates (a criterion of 3%/3 mm) were 80.6 ± 6.6% for the PB dose, 87.6 ± 6.0% for the baseline model, 92.1 ± 4.7% for the image-rotation model, and 93.0 ± 5.2% for the data-augmentation model, respectively. Moreover, the average range differences for R90 were - 1.5 ± 3.6% in the PB dose, 0.2 ± 2.3% in the baseline model, -0.5 ± 1.2% in the image-rotation model, and - 0.5 ± 1.1% in the data-augmentation model, respectively. The doses as well as ranges were improved by the image-rotation technique and zooming augmentation. The image-rotation technique and zooming augmentation greatly improved the DL-based dose conversion accuracy from the PB to the MC. These techniques can be powerful tools for improving the DL-based dose calculation accuracy in PBT.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsDeep LearningHead and Neck NeoplasmsMonte Carlo MethodProton TherapyRadiation DosageHumansRadiotherapy DosageRadiotherapy Planning, Computer-AssistedTomography, X-Ray Computeddeep learninghead and neckMonte Carlopencil beam algorithmproton therapy

Identifiers

PMID40267259
PMCPMC12100469

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.