Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40267119›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Preventing the preventable: Assessing the burden of incessant caesarean deliveries in select Indian states using NFHS-5.

Punit Mishra, Retna Sheeja Pushpa Raj, Aditi Aditi, Muthusamy Sivakami

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Punit MishraPopulationCouncil Consulting, New Delhi, Delhi, India.ORCID 0000-0002-1283-5385
Retna Sheeja Pushpa RajAll India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), New Delhi, Delhi, India.ORCID 0009-0003-5610-7886
Aditi AditiPopulationCouncil Consulting, New Delhi, Delhi, India.
Muthusamy SivakamiTata Institute for Social Sciences, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends that life-saving Caesarean sections (CS) should account for 10-15% of deliveries. Southern states of India have good obstetric facilities and better public health systems than other parts of India. However, CS rates in select states are considerably higher. This study examines the prevalence and determinants of preventable CS among mothers in select Indian states, specifically the states that have high institutional deliveries (>95%) viz. Andhra Pradesh, Kerala, Karnataka, and Tamil Nadu. It further compares the complications faced by CS and vaginal delivery cases. Data has been derived from a cross-sectional survey, the National Family Health Survey-5. Bivariate and Logistic regression analyses were used. The main outcome measured is Preventable C-sections, defined as per conditions in Robson's criteria of 10-group classification based on obstetric characteristics for a woman. Results show that the preventable CS rates in these selected states were much higher than at the national level. Key correlates were higher education and middle socioeconomic status. The study highlights the need for policy reforms, maternal education, and healthcare system improvements to reduce unnecessary CS in select states of India, where the health system is exceptionally good but , have another health burden in form of demand for unnecessary caesarean deliveries.

Indexed as

Cesarean SectionAdolescentAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansIndiaPregnancyYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID40267119
PMCPMC12017520

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.