ArticlePloS one2025
Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 1 and long-term risk of progression and treatment.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Five-Year Risk of CIN3+ After CIN1 Biopsy in a Norwegian Screening Setting: Comparison of CIN1 Diagnosed in a Single Calendar Year and in Two Consecutive Calendar Years.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Article
- Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 1 (CIN1) is often managed by active surveillance, as the risk of progression to high grade lesions is reported to be low, but long-term data is sparse. To inform management of CIN1, we estimated risk of progression and occurrence of treatment in women attending a cervical cancer screening program.
methodsWe used nationwide, registry data on all women aged 25-69 years attending the Norwegian Cervical Cancer Screening Program in 2002-2019. The eligible source population was women with at least one cytology registration (n = 1,771,876). Women with a histologically confirmed, first CIN1 diagnosis were included (n = 26,130) and followed for detection of CIN2+, defined as histologically confirmed CIN2, CIN3, adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS), or cervical cancer. CIN3+ was defined as CIN3, AIS, or cervical cancer. Treatment included both excision and ablation.
resultsOverall, the cumulative incidence of CIN2+ increased to 9.5% (95% confidence interval (CI), 8.8 to 9.5) during the first year and to 19.0% (95% CI, 18.4-19.5) during the first five years. For women with high-grade cytology, 5-year cumulative incidence reached 26.0% (95% CI, 25.0-27.0), whereas for women with normal or low-grade cytology, but HPV16 and/or HPV18 positive status, the corresponding estimate was 25.0% (95% CI, 23.3-26.8). Other high-risk HPV genotypes and HPV negative status were associated with lower risks (5-year cumulative incidence 15.5% (95% CI, 14.5-16.6) and 8.2% (95% CI, 7.1-9.5), respectively). Detection of CIN3+ was substantial (cumulative incidence 5.7% (95% CI, 5.4-6.0) and 12.7% (95% CI, 12.2-13.1) after 1 and 5 years, respectively), and overall, cumulative incidence of treatment was 15.2% (95% CI, 14.7-15.7) after 5 years, following similar patterns as observed for CIN2+.
conclusionsA differentiation of follow-up guidelines by index cytology and HPV16/18 status for women diagnosed with CIN1, might be warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.