ArticlePLOS global public health2025
Stepping Stones and Creating Futures Plus: A pilot randomised controlled trial of a co-developed intervention with young South Africans.
Article in PLOS global public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05783336 (An Inter-disciplinary Approach to Understanding and Intervening on Contextual Factors That Shape HIV-risk for Young Women and Men in South Africa), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
An Inter-disciplinary Approach to Understanding and Intervening on Contextual Factors That Shape HIV-risk for Young Women and Men in South Africa: Phase 2 - the Feasibility, Acceptability and Potential Effect Size of a Pilot Randomised Controlled Trial
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- E le Saua le Alofa (Love shouldn't hurt): exploring the acceptability, feasibility and potential impact of a co-developed intervention to prevent violence against women in Samoa.BMC public health · 2026Article
- The relationship between emotional dysregulation and, HIV acquisition risk behaviours and intimate partner violence perpetration among young men in rural areas and urban informal settlements in South Africa.Psychology, health & medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Marginalised young women and men in South Africa experience and perpetrate high rates of intimate partner violence (IPV), shaped by their contexts and life histories. To address this, we co-developed Stepping Stones and Creating Futures Plus (SSCF+) with young women and men living in marginalised communities to reduce IPV, strengthen livelihoods and improve mental health. We assessed the intervention's feasibility, acceptability and potential impact, when delivered to small single-gender friendship groups, through a mixed-methods study. We had 30 groups for men and women, and randomly allocated groups to receive the intervention or not. In-depth interviews were conducted post-intervention with n=23 women and n=22 men. Participants were aged 18-30 living in selected communities. We assessed the acceptability of the intervention (participant attendance, overall views) and evidence of change in IPV perpetration (men) and experience (women), livelihoods and mental health 5-6 months post-baseline, and hypothesised mechanisms of change. N=163 men and N=162 women were recruited and we followed up 96.9% men and 100% women at endline. 81% women and 53% men attended at least 70% of sessions, but 3 clusters (10%) ended early. Participants reported the intervention was relevant and enjoyable for them, although they raised some areas for strengthening. At endline, women reported non-significant reductions in physical IPV (aOR0.64, 0.27, 1.53), sexual IPV (aOR0.59, 0.21, 1.65) and severe IPV (aOR0.73, 0.30, 1.75), and significant improvements in livelihoods and mental health. Men reported significantly less physical IPV perpetration (aOR0.38, 0.17, 0.81) and non-significant reductions in sexual IPV (aOR0.77, 0.39, 1.51) and severe IPV (aOR0.86, 0.47, 1.56), as well as improved livelihoods, but no change in mental health. The co-developed SSCF+ intervention was acceptable and showed promise in reducing IPV and strengthening livelihoods, as well as addressing overlapping risk factors. Further research is required to determine its effectiveness. The study was pre-registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT05783336).
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.