ArticlePLOS global public health2025
What it takes to become a physician scientist in a low- and middle-income country.
Article in PLOS global public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Physician-scientists, who have dual medical and advanced research training, are a scarce and valuable asset. They bridge clinical practice and research, address critical medical challenges with a scientific perspective, and drive innovation by translating discoveries into patient care. Physicians with research expertise are particularly adept at critically evaluating scientific literature to improve their practice and ensure that they provide up-to-date, individualised, and evidence-based care to their patients. However, the path to becoming a physician-scientist in Low- and Middle-Income Countries (LMICs) is fraught with challenges. In this article, we explore the difficulties faced by physician-scientists in LMICs, including lengthy and arduous training, systems that favour eminence-based over evidence-based medicine, and financial disincentives for pursuing a dual career in medicine and research. The article also highlights the significant underrepresentation of women in medical and scientific fields, compounded by gender-specific challenges such as balancing motherhood with career demands, gender pay gaps, and the lack of supportive and affirmative policies. We advocate for reforms in medical education to create a more supportive environment for aspiring physician-scientists. Addressing these issues can help LMICs enhance the contribution of physician-scientists to global health and scientific advancement.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.