Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40267063›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Semantic priming supports infants' ability to learn names of unseen objects.

Elena Luchkina, Sandra Waxman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Elena LuchkinaDepartment of Psychology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States Of America.ORCID 0000-0001-7350-9367
Sandra WaxmanInstitute of Policy Research, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois, United States Of America.

Funding

NICHD NIH HHS 13251277
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human language permits us to call to mind representations of objects, events, and ideas that we cannot witness directly, enabling us to learn about the world far beyond our immediate surroundings. When and how does this capacity emerge? To address this question, we evaluated infants at 12 and 15 months, asking whether they establish a representation of a novel noun's meaning in the absence of any visible referents, and use this representation to identify a candidate referent when it later becomes available. During training, infants (67 12-month-olds; 67 15-month-olds) were primed with words and images of objects from a particular semantic neighborhood (e.g., fruits) and were also introduced to a novel noun (e.g., "a modi"), used to name a hidden object. During test, infants heard that noun again, this time with two unfamiliar objects present-one from the primed neighborhood (e.g., a dragon fruit) and the other from an unrelated semantic neighborhood (e.g., an ottoman). If infants can represent something about the meaning of the novel noun in the absence of a visible referent and then use such a representation when a candidate referent appears, then at test, they should prefer the object from the primed semantic neighborhood. At 15 months, infants succeeded. In contrast, 12-month-olds did not succeed on this task even after a full week of vocabulary training designed to boost the effect of priming. It is possible then that 12-month-olds' representations of novel nouns' meaning are not yet sufficiently rich (if any at all) to guide their choice of referent when one does appear. Together, these findings suggest that the capacity to establish a representation of a novel noun's meaning in the absence of any visible referent and use this representation later to identify a candidate referent object emerges between 12 and 15 months.

Indexed as

Language DevelopmentLearningSemanticsFemaleHumansInfantMaleNames

Identifiers

PMID40267063
PMCPMC12017536

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.