Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40266968›Full record

SynthesisBrazilian journal of cardiovascular surgery2025

Five-Year Mortality of Surgical and Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in the Real-World Scenario: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Propensity Score Matching Studies.

Mateo Marin-Cuartas, Bianca Dalbesio, Francesco Pollari, Matteo Scarpanti, Amedeo Anselmi, Manuela de la Cuesta, Miguel Sousa Uva, Jean-Philippe Verhoye, Francesco Musumeci, Fabio Barili and 1 more

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Brazilian journal of cardiovascular surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Mateo Marin-CuartasUniversity Department of Cardiac Surgery, Leipzig Heart Center, Leipzig, Germany.
Bianca DalbesioDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, S. Croce Hospital, Cuneo, Italy.
Francesco PollariCardiac Surgery, Klinikum Nürnberg-Paracelsus Medical University, Nuremberg, Germany.
Matteo ScarpantiUniversity Cardiac Surgery Unit, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, San Donato, Italy.
Amedeo AnselmiDepartment of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, University Hospital of Rennes, Rennes, France.
Manuela de la CuestaUniversity Department of Cardiac Surgery, Leipzig Heart Center, Leipzig, Germany.
Miguel Sousa UvaDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Hospital Santa Cruz, Carnaxide, Portugal.
Jean-Philippe VerhoyeDepartment of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, University Hospital of Rennes, Rennes, France.
Francesco MusumeciDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, ISMETT, Palermo, Italy.
Fabio BariliUniversity Cardiac Surgery Unit, IRCCS Ospedale Galeazzi Sant'Ambrogio, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9737-6087
Alessandro ParolariUniversity Cardiac Surgery Unit, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, San Donato, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionRandomized controlled trials (RCTs) provide evidence of efficacy, while real-world data (RWD) demonstrate effectiveness in real-world practice. We designed a systematic review and meta-analysis of reconstructed time-to-event (RTE) data from propensity score matching studies comparing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) and surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) to compare their effectiveness and evaluate the generalizability of TAVI indications.

methodsSystematic review of literature between 2007 and 2023 including propensity score matching studies comparing TAVI or SAVR that reported at least one-year Kaplan-Meier curves of endpoints.

resultsTwenty-one studies were included (39538 participants). TAVI shows a higher all-cause mortality (hazard ratio [HR] 1.41; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.34-1.47, P-value < 0.001), with a significant heterogeneity. The analysis of HR trend over time shows that TAVI superiority is limited to the first month with a steep reversal afterwards, when SAVR becomes clearly superior. All-cause mortality is significantly higher in TAVI in low-risk (HR 1.35; 95% CI 1.08-1.69, P-value < 0.001) as well as in intermediate (HR 1.73; 95% CI 1.35-2.22, P-value < 0.001) and high-risk (HR 1.61; 95% CI 1.38-1.88, P-value < 0.001) patients. The HR trend in the subgroups of risk confirms the data from the whole mixed population.

conclusionIn a real-word setting, TAVI is associated with higher incidence of all-cause death and maintains a survival benefit only in the first month after implantation. These results show that TAVI effectiveness may not reflect the efficacy demonstrated by RCTs and pose a threat to their external validity.

Indexed as

Aortic Valve StenosisHeart Valve Prosthesis ImplantationTranscatheter Aortic Valve ReplacementHumansPropensity ScoreRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRisk FactorsTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeAortic ValveMeta-AnalysisSystematic ReviewTranscatheter Aortic Valve Replacement

Identifiers

PMID40266968
PMCPMC12017277

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.