ArticleVeterinary sciences2025
Evaluating the Effect of Dietary Protein-Energy Ratios on Yak Intestinal Microbiota Using High-Throughput 16S rRNA Gene Sequencing.
Article in Veterinary sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Lactobacillus Supplementation Modulates Rumen Microbiota and Metabolism in Yaks Under Fattening Feeding Conditions: A Comprehensive Multi-Omics Analysis.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study investigated the impact of varying dietary protein-energy ratios on the intestinal microbiota composition in postpartum weaned female yak. For this study, forty yaks were divided into four groups and provided with different dietary treatments (group FA: high-energy high-protein, FB: high-energy low-protein, FC: low-energy high-protein, and FD: control group, provided with 48% alfalfa hay, 48% oat grass, and 4% premix) to investigate the variations in microflora profiles and metabolic responses. Rectal fecal samples (n = 24 × 2) were collected at day 15 and 30, from all four groups, and total DNA was extracted to estimate microbial heterogeneity and community structures by 16S rRNA sequencing focusing V3-V4 regions, using the Illumina Nova Seq 6000 platform. The results revealed a total of 5,669,645 raw data sequences (3,189,115 and 2,480,530 from day 15 and day 30, respectively). Results showed that groups FA and FB had enhanced protein metabolism and microbial diversity, which was marked by a significant increase (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.