Quantifying Potentially Suitable Geographical Habitat Changes in Chinese Caterpillar Fungus with Enhanced MaxEnt Model.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Predicting the Potential Distribution of Quesada gigas Under Current and Future Climate Conditions Using MaxEnt.Neotropical entomology · 2026
   Article
2. Modelled climatic suitability contraction and high-altitude persistence: Projected mid-century distribution dynamics of Ophiocordyceps sinensis across the Tibetan Plateau under a selected climate scenario.PloS one · 2026
   Article
3. MaxEnt-based suitable areas analysis of global lumpy skin disease under current and future climate scenarios.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Funding

Abstract

Indexed as