Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40266691›Full record

ArticleQuality management in health care

A Quality Improvement Project to Improve Nurse-Patient Communication and Patient Satisfaction in an Outpatient Center.

Ying Shen, Xiaoqiu Zhu, Fang Lei, Lifei Feng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Quality management in health care. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ying ShenAuthor Affiliations: Nursing Department, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University, School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, People's Republic of China (Ms Shen, Ms Zhu, and Ms Feng); School of Nursing, University of Minnesota Twin Cities, Minneapolis, Minnesota (Dr Lei).
Xiaoqiu Zhu
Fang Lei
Lifei Feng

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesPoor communication complicates patients' understanding of their diagnosis and nursing care, which can jeopardize patients' treatment and prognosis. Streamlined nurse-patient communication interventions are proven to improve patient satisfaction and nursing care quality. Guided by the Plan-Do-Study-Act Quality Improvement Model, we used the Contact, Introduce, Communicate, Ask, Respond, and Exit (CICARE) communication mode aimed at improving nurse-patient communication and patient satisfaction in our outpatient center.

methodsNurses in the center were trained on CICARE communication mode in the 1-month training sessions. They incorporated the CICARE communication mode into their routine nursing practices for all outpatients. Data were collected before implementation of the project and at 1-month post-implementation, between October 2023 and March 2024. The CICARE communication mode utilization rate, nurses' communication knowledge, practice skills, and ability, and the patient satisfaction rate were measured.

resultsA total of 28 outpatient nurses attended the education training sessions. The utilization rate of the CICARE communication mode was 86%. Compared to before training, nurses' communication knowledge, practice skills, and ability, and the patient satisfaction scores improved significantly after training ( P < .05).

conclusionApplication of the CICARE communication mode in outpatient nursing work is beneficial for enhancing nurses' proficiency in nurse-patient communication and improving patient satisfaction, which can help to increase the quality of nursing care.

Indexed as

Ambulatory Care FacilitiesCommunicationNurse-Patient RelationsPatient SatisfactionQuality ImprovementAdultClinical CompetenceFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedCICARE communication modecommunication skilloutpatient nursespatient satisfactionquality improvement

Identifiers

PMID40266691
PMCPMC12517711

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.