Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40266669›Full record

ArticleAngewandte Chemie (International ed. in English)2025

Bayesian Meta-Learning for Few-Shot Reaction Outcome Prediction of Asymmetric Hydrogenation of Olefins.

Sukriti Singh, José Miguel Hernández-Lobato

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sukriti SinghDepartment of Engineering, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 1PZ, U.K.
José Miguel Hernández-LobatoDepartment of Engineering, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 1PZ, U.K.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent years have witnessed the increasing application of machine learning (ML) in chemical reaction development. These ML methods, in general, require huge training set examples. The published literature has large amounts of data, but there are modelling challenges due to the sparse nature of these datasets. Herein, we report a meta-learning workflow that can utilize the literature-mined data and return accurate predictions with limited data. A literature dataset comprising of over 12 000 transition metal catalyzed asymmetric hydrogenation of olefins (AHO) is chosen to demonstrate the utility of our protocol. A meta-model is trained in a binary classification setting to identify highly enantioselective AHO reactions. Two Bayesian meta-learning approaches are considered, namely, deep kernel transfer (DKT) and adaptive deep kernel fitting (ADKF). Both these methods returned better predictions compared to prototypical network, which is another popular meta-learning approach. Single-task methods, such as random forest, graph neural network, and deep kernel learning, performed worse than meta-learning methods even when trained on full training data. Additionally, we propose another meta-learning approach called ADKF-prior that is shown to further improve the performance in low-data settings. The generalizability of our meta-model is also evaluated on substrate- and time-based splits. Our meta-learning workflow can be utilized to build a pretrained meta-model for any reaction of interest, which can then be useful to predict the outcome of new but related reactions in a few-shot manners.

Indexed as

Adaptive deep kernel fittingAsymmetric catalysisAsymmetric hydrogenationBayesianDeep kernel learningDeep kernel transferMachine learningMeta‐learningPrototypical networksReaction outcome prediction

Identifiers

PMID40266669
PMCPMC12207359

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.