Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40266658›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2025

Development and Validation of a Dynamic Real-Time Risk Prediction Model for Intensive Care Units Patients Based on Longitudinal Irregular Data: Multicenter Retrospective Study.

Zhuo Zheng, Jiawei Luo, Yingchao Zhu, Lei Du, Lan Lan, Xiaobo Zhou, Xiaoyan Yang, Shixin Huang

Abstract readMulticenter StudyValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Zhuo Zheng *Department of Anesthesiology, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-8660-466X
Jiawei Luo *West China Biomedical Big Data Center, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1617-3224
Yingchao Zhu *Department of Anesthesiology, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2945-0163
Lei DuDepartment of Anesthesiology, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9505-085X
Lan LanInformation Management and Data Center, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2161-4936
Xiaobo ZhouCenter for Computational Systems Medicine, McWilliams School of Biomedical Informatics, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7191-6495
Xiaoyan YangWest China Biomedical Big Data Center, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3293-6201
Shixin HuangDepartment of Scientific Research, The People's Hospital of Yubei District of Chongqing City, Chongqing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-7931-7056

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTimely and accurate prediction of short-term mortality is critical in intensive care units (ICUs), where patients' conditions change rapidly. Traditional scoring systems, such as the Simplified Acute Physiology Score and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation, rely on static variables collected within the first 24 hours of admission and do not account for continuously evolving clinical states. These systems lack real-time adaptability, interpretability, and generalizability. With the increasing availability of high-frequency electronic medical record (EMR) data, machine learning (ML) approaches have emerged as powerful tools to model complex temporal patterns and support dynamic clinical decision-making. However, existing models are often limited by their inability to handle irregular sampling and missing values, and many lack rigorous external validation across institutions.

objectiveWe aimed to develop a real-time, interpretable risk prediction model that continuously assesses ICU patient mortality using irregular, longitudinal EMR data, with improved performance and generalizability over traditional static scoring systems.

methodsA time-aware bidirectional attention-based long short-term memory (TBAL) model was developed using EMR data from the MIMIC-IV (Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care) and eICU Collaborative Research Database (eICU-CRD) databases, comprising 176,344 ICU stays. The model incorporated dynamic variables, including vital signs, laboratory results, and medication data, updated hourly, to perform static and continuous mortality risk assessments. External cross-validation and subgroup sensitivity analyses were conducted to evaluate robustness and fairness. Model performance was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), area under the precision-recall curve (AUPRC), accuracy, and F

resultsFor the static 12-hour to 1-day mortality prediction task, the TBAL model achieved AUROCs of 95.9 (95% CI 94.2-97.5) and 93.3 (95% CI 91.5-95.3) and AUPRCs of 48.5 and 21.6 in MIMIC-IV and eICU-CRD, respectively. Accuracy and F

conclusionsThe TBAL model offers a robust, interpretable, and generalizable solution for dynamic real-time mortality risk prediction in ICU patients. Its ability to adapt to irregular temporal patterns and to provide hourly updated predictions positions it as a promising decision-support tool. Future work should validate its utility in prospective clinical trials and investigate its integration into real-world ICU workflows to enhance patient outcomes.

Indexed as

Hospital MortalityIntensive Care UnitsAgedElectronic Health RecordsFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMachine LearningMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesRisk Assessmentcontinuous predictionin-hospital mortalityintensive care unitsmachine learningmodel interpretability

Identifiers

PMID40266658
PMCPMC12059492

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.