ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2025
Development and Validation of a Dynamic Real-Time Risk Prediction Model for Intensive Care Units Patients Based on Longitudinal Irregular Data: Multicenter Retrospective Study.
Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Dynamic Prediction of Clinical Endpoints in Survival Analysis With Machine and Deep Learning: A Systematic Review and Regulatory Perspective.CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology · 2026Pooled it
- Prediction models for mortality in patients with acute on chronic liver failure: systematic review and critical appraisal.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Machine learning-based mortality risk prediction models in patients with sepsis-associated acute kidney injury: a systematic review.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Early Detection of Clinical Deterioration in ICU Patients With Respiratory Failure Receiving Vasoactive Support: A Machine Learning Approach to Identifying High-Risk Individuals.Health science reports · 2026Article
- Development and multicenter validation of machine learning models for 28-day mortality in critically ill patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2026Article
- Blood biomarker trajectories in ICU-directed prediction models - A scoping review.The EPMA journal · 2026Review
- Dynamic prognostic nutritional index and 28-day mortality in sepsis: a joint modeling analysis.Nutrition & metabolism · 2026Article
- Predicting Future Organ Support Needs Using Longitudinal Emergency Department Data: A Proof-of-Concept Study.Research square · 2026Article
- Dynamic prognostic prediction in sepsis using longitudinal blood gas trajectories: development and external validation.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- From static snapshots to longitudinal trajectories: artificial intelligence in women's reproductive and ovarian health.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Review
- Beyond static risk scores: dynamic world models simulating patient-specific trajectories to inform preoperative risk mitigation strategies.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Dynamic ensemble deep learning with multi-source data for robust influenza forecasting in Yangzhou.BMC public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTimely and accurate prediction of short-term mortality is critical in intensive care units (ICUs), where patients' conditions change rapidly. Traditional scoring systems, such as the Simplified Acute Physiology Score and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation, rely on static variables collected within the first 24 hours of admission and do not account for continuously evolving clinical states. These systems lack real-time adaptability, interpretability, and generalizability. With the increasing availability of high-frequency electronic medical record (EMR) data, machine learning (ML) approaches have emerged as powerful tools to model complex temporal patterns and support dynamic clinical decision-making. However, existing models are often limited by their inability to handle irregular sampling and missing values, and many lack rigorous external validation across institutions.
objectiveWe aimed to develop a real-time, interpretable risk prediction model that continuously assesses ICU patient mortality using irregular, longitudinal EMR data, with improved performance and generalizability over traditional static scoring systems.
methodsA time-aware bidirectional attention-based long short-term memory (TBAL) model was developed using EMR data from the MIMIC-IV (Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care) and eICU Collaborative Research Database (eICU-CRD) databases, comprising 176,344 ICU stays. The model incorporated dynamic variables, including vital signs, laboratory results, and medication data, updated hourly, to perform static and continuous mortality risk assessments. External cross-validation and subgroup sensitivity analyses were conducted to evaluate robustness and fairness. Model performance was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), area under the precision-recall curve (AUPRC), accuracy, and F
resultsFor the static 12-hour to 1-day mortality prediction task, the TBAL model achieved AUROCs of 95.9 (95% CI 94.2-97.5) and 93.3 (95% CI 91.5-95.3) and AUPRCs of 48.5 and 21.6 in MIMIC-IV and eICU-CRD, respectively. Accuracy and F
conclusionsThe TBAL model offers a robust, interpretable, and generalizable solution for dynamic real-time mortality risk prediction in ICU patients. Its ability to adapt to irregular temporal patterns and to provide hourly updated predictions positions it as a promising decision-support tool. Future work should validate its utility in prospective clinical trials and investigate its integration into real-world ICU workflows to enhance patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.