Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40266627›Full record

ArticleJournal of orthopaedic trauma2025

Patient and Hospital Factors Affecting the Timing of Hip Fracture Surgery: A Risk-Stratified Analysis in the United States.

Daniel You, Nathan N O'Hara, Sara Kheiri, Arissa M Torrie, Gerard P Slobogean

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of orthopaedic trauma, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Daniel YouR Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center, Department of Orthopaedics, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
Gerard P SlobogeanORCID 0000-0002-9111-9239

Funding

Development of orthopaedic surgeon-scientist expertise in patient-oriented researchK24AR076445 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI Gerard Slobogean · 2020 to 2026
$1.1M
NIAMS NIH HHS K24 AR076445
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo determine the proportion of high-risk for surgical delay hip fracture patients who experienced delayed surgery and if associations exist among hospitals achieving timely surgical care in high-risk patients.

methodsDesign: Retrospective cohort.

settingNational Inpatient Sample (NIS) database. PATIENT SELECTION CRITERIA: Hip fracture patients aged 65 years and older identified using ICD-10 codes in the NIS from 2016 through 2020 were included. OUTCOME MEASURES AND COMPARISONS: The primary outcome was surgery on post-admission day 3 or greater (delayed surgery), compared across patient groups stratified by risk for surgical delay using an established model incorporating Elixhauser Comorbidity score, age, gender, and race. Factors associated with hospital-level surgical delay were assessed using multivariable logistic regression.

results1,142,625 patients met the eligibility criteria. Most patients were female (70%) and Medicare beneficiaries (91%). The median patient age was 83 (IQR 76 to 89). The proportion of patients categorized as high-, moderate-, and low-risk for surgical delay were 7%, 81%, and 12%, respectively. Three percent of low-risk patients received surgery on post-admission day 3 or later compared to 7% and 12% of patients in the moderate- and high-risk groups respectively (P<0.01). At 2176 hospitals (62%), all high-risk patients were reported to have their surgery performed within 2 days. At 620 hospitals (18%), 27% of high-risk patients experienced delays of 3 days or more. Compared to hospitals with no surgical delays in their high-risk patients, the highest twentieth percentile of hospitals with surgical delay in high-risk patients were more likely to be teaching hospitals (OR, 1.4; 95% CI, 1.1 to 1.8; P=0.02), located in the Northeast (OR, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.3 to 2.4; P<0.01) or South (OR, 1.6; 95% CI, 1.3 to 2.1; P<0.01), and have a higher proportion of high-risk patients (OR, 3.4; 95% CI, 1.4 to 5.9; P=0.01).

conclusionsWhile the majority of patients with a hip fracture in the United States received timely surgery within 2 days, a substantial proportion of high-risk hip fracture patients experienced surgical delays. The causes of these surgical delays remain unclear, whether from resource limitations, time for medical optimization, competing surgical priorities, or systemic factors driving regional variations in care delivery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic, Level III.

Indexed as

high-risk patientship fracturehip fracture surgerysurgical delay

Identifiers

PMID40266627
PMCPMC12210284

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.