Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40266615›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2025

Incidence and Prevalence of Reported Euthanasia Cases in Belgium, 2002 to 2023.

Jacques Wels, Natasia Hamarat

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jacques WelsMRC (Medical Research Council) Unit for Lifelong Health and Ageing, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Natasia HamaratCentre de Droit Public et Social, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Reported cases of assisted dying have increased in countries with such legislation. In Belgium, where euthanasia was legalized in mid-2002, cases rose from 236 in 2003 to 3423 in 2023. Most previous studies have focused on occurrence rates. Objective: To examine the magnitude of the increase in euthanasia cases and its association with demographic changes observed during the study period. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study analyzed complete data from the Belgian Federal Commission for the Control and Evaluation of Euthanasia (FCCEE) from September 1, 2002, to December 31, 2023, and adjusted the model for demographic composition and change by gender, age group, and region using data from the Belgian Office for Statistics. All cases of euthanasia reported to the FCCEE during the selected period were included. Exposure: Euthanasia reported to the FCCEE. Main Outcome and Measures: Poisson regression with and without a demographic offset was used to provide the rate ratios (RRs) and the prevalence rates (PRs) for euthanasia. The RRs were calculated by age, gender, region, and euthanasia characteristics. Estimates used a model including demographic offsets to calculate PRs and explore interactions across subcategories. Results: During the selected period, 33 647 cases of euthanasia were reported (50.23% male; 84.74% 60 years or older); analyses focused on 33 580 valid cases. The yearly RR was 1.07 (95% CI, 1.07-1.07), while the yearly PR was 1.05 (95% CI, 1.05-1.06), indicating that demographic changes were associated with the observed increase. The PR for euthanasia among males relative to females was overall higher (PR, 1.36; 95% CI, 1.33-1.39) but has decreased slightly (PR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.99-1.00). Cases citing multimorbidity increased relative to those citing tumors (PR, 1.03; 95% CI, 1.02-1.04), whereas cases related to psychiatric disorders and deaths in care homes did not show significant increases. Higher prevalence was observed in the Flemish region relative to Wallonia (PR, 1.51; 95% CI, 1.47-1.55), but the gap has narrowed over the years. Conclusions and Relevance: This study found that a substantial part of the increase in euthanasia cases was attributable to demographic changes. Early increases were mainly due to the regulatory onset, while recent trends reflect a growing influence of demographic factors and regional adjustments. These findings suggest that considering demographic shifts is essential, and long-term trends should be monitored.

Indexed as

EuthanasiaSuicide, AssistedAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBelgiumCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedPrevalenceYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID40266615
PMCPMC12019508

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.