ArticleJournal of vision2025
hMT+ activity predicts the effect of spatial attention on surround suppression.
Article in Journal of vision, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Distinct mechanisms of contextual modulation for dynamic natural scenes in motion- and scene-selective cortex.Journal of neurophysiology · 2026Article
- Characterizing surround suppression with dynamic natural scenes.Journal of vision · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Surround suppression refers to the decrease in behavioral sensitivity and neural response to a central stimulus due to the presence of surrounding stimuli. Several aspects of surround suppression in human motion perception have been studied in detail, including its atypicality in some clinical populations. However, how the extent of spatial attention affects the strength of surround suppression has not been systematically studied before. To address this question, we presented human participants with "center" and "surround" drifting gratings and sought to find whether attending only to the center ("narrow attention") versus both to the center and surround ("wide attention") modulates the suppression strength in motion processing. Using psychophysics and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), we measured motion direction discrimination thresholds and cortical activity in the primary visual cortex (V1) and middle temporal complex (hMT+). We found increased perceptual thresholds and, thus, stronger surround suppression under the wide-attention condition. We also found that the pattern of hMT+ activity was consistent with the behavioral results. Furthermore, a mathematical model that combines spatial attention and divisive normalization was able to explain the pattern in the behavioral and fMRI results. These findings provide a deeper understanding of how attention affects center-surround interactions and suggest possible neural mechanisms with relevance to both basic and clinical vision science.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.