Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40266592›Full record

ArticleInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2025

Structure-Function Associations Between Quantitative Contrast Sensitivity Function And Peripapillary Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography in Diabetic Retinopathy.

Sierra K Ha, Xinyi Ding, Francesco Romano, Katherine M Overbey, Filippos Vingopoulos, Itika Garg, Cade F Bennett, Isabella Stettler, Ioanna Ploumi, Grace Baldwin and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Decreasing Radial Peripapillary Capillary Perfusion Density Correlated With Visual Field Impairment in High Myopia.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Sierra K HaHarvard Retinal Imaging Lab, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States.
Xinyi DingHarvard Retinal Imaging Lab, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States.
Francesco RomanoHarvard Retinal Imaging Lab, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States.
Katherine M OverbeyHarvard Retinal Imaging Lab, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States.
Filippos VingopoulosHarvard Retinal Imaging Lab, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States.
Itika GargHarvard Retinal Imaging Lab, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States.
Cade F BennettHarvard Retinal Imaging Lab, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States.
Isabella StettlerHarvard Retinal Imaging Lab, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States.
Ioanna PloumiHarvard Retinal Imaging Lab, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States.
Grace BaldwinHarvard Retinal Imaging Lab, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States.
Matthew J FinnHarvard Retinal Imaging Lab, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States.
Peyman RazaviHarvard Retinal Imaging Lab, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States.
Demetrios G VavvasRetina Service, Department of Ophthalmology, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Boston, Massachusetts, United States.
Deeba HusainRetina Service, Department of Ophthalmology, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Boston, Massachusetts, United States.
Nimesh A PatelRetina Service, Department of Ophthalmology, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Boston, Massachusetts, United States.
Leo A KimRetina Service, Department of Ophthalmology, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Boston, Massachusetts, United States.
John B MillerHarvard Retinal Imaging Lab, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To assess changes in radial peripapillary capillary (RPC) microvasculature and their impact on visual function, measured by visual acuity (VA) and contrast sensitivity, in diabetic retinopathy (DR). Methods: This was a cross-sectional study in 96 eyes of 67 patients, including controls, diabetes without DR (DMnoDR), nonproliferative DR (NPDR), and proliferative DR (PDR) groups. Participants underwent same-day quantitative contrast sensitivity function (qCSF) and 6 × 6 mm OCT angiography (OCTA) centered on the optic disc. The Peripapillary Nerve Fiber Layer Microvasculature Density algorithm (ARI Network) was used to calculate capillary perfusion density (total area of perfused microvasculature per unit area), capillary flux index (CFI, total weighted area of perfused microvasculature per unit area), and retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness surrounding the optic disc. Mixed-effects multivariable regression models, controlling for age, hypertension, and lens status, evaluated associations between RPC OCTA metrics, DR severity, VA, and qCSF. Results: Significant RPC microvascular changes were observed across DR stages. Capillary perfusion density decreased with DR severity and even before retinopathy onset in DMnoDR versus controls (βavg = -0.42, P = 0.021). PDR compared to NPDR showed a significant decrease in CFI (β = -1.02 to -0.92, P < 0.01) and in RNFL (βavg = -0.71, P = 0.033). CFI had significant associations with qCSF at various spatial frequencies (β = 0.20 to 0.34, P = 0.002 to 0.042), but not with VA. Conclusions: Radial peripapillary capillary perfusion density worsens with onset of diabetes and increasing severity of DR while capillary flux index is more significantly affected later in disease. Structure-function associations suggest that DR-induced peripapillary microvascular changes are more strongly associated with contrast sensitivity changes than with visual acuity.

Indexed as

Contrast SensitivityDiabetic RetinopathyFluorescein AngiographyOptic DiskRetinal VesselsTomography, Optical CoherenceAdultAgedCapillariesCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNerve FibersRetinal Ganglion Cells

Identifiers

PMID40266592
PMCPMC12025313

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.