ArticleClinical rehabilitation2025
What is the level of work and societal participation in patients with pelvic ring injuries? A two-year prospective cohort study.
Article in Clinical rehabilitation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
ObjectiveTo provide insight into the impact of pelvic ring injuries on patients' work and school activities and participation in society.DesignProspective-cohort study.SettingA level-1 trauma center in the Netherlands.Participants195 patients with a pelvic ring injury.Main measuresThe work or school activities and participation in society domains of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Score II (WHO-DAS II) were administered at admission (pre-injury score), 3 months, 6 months, 1 year and 2 years following the injury.ResultsBefore the injury, the median scores were 80 for both work or school activities and participation in society. The scores 3 months after the injury were 40 and 60, respectively, but both improved to 75 after 2 years. The percentage of non-recovered patients decreased over time, from 45% to 35% for work or school activities and from 34% to 18% for participation in society between 6 months and 2 years. At work or school, patients struggled to complete daily tasks and important activities as efficiently and effectively as needed. Regarding participation in society, patients struggled with the amount of time spent managing their injuries, joining community activities, and doing things for relaxation. No relationships between patients or injury characteristics and recovery were identified one year following the injury.ConclusionsPelvic ring injuries greatly impact patients' work or school activities and participation in society. However, these domains greatly improve within the first two years, with many individuals regaining their pre-injury capabilities. Still, some continue to experience long-term difficulties in participation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.