Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40266553›Full record

Trial reportSports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.)2025

Aerobic Exercise Preconditioning Does Not Augment Muscle Hypertrophy During Subsequent Resistance Exercise Training in Healthy Older Adults.

Milan W Betz, Alejandra P Monsegue, Lisanne H P Houben, Floris K Hendriks, Janneau van Kranenburg, Thorben Aussieker, Bouke P Adriaans, Alfons J H M Houben, Lex B Verdijk, Luc J C van Loon and 1 more

Erratum issuedAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Health Benefits of Cycling as a Form of Active Travel: A Pilot Empirical Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Milan W BetzDepartment of Human Biology, NUTRIM Institute of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, P.O. Box 616, 6200 MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Alejandra P MonsegueDepartment of Human Biology, NUTRIM Institute of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, P.O. Box 616, 6200 MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Lisanne H P HoubenDepartment of Human Biology, NUTRIM Institute of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, P.O. Box 616, 6200 MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Floris K HendriksDepartment of Human Biology, NUTRIM Institute of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, P.O. Box 616, 6200 MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Janneau van KranenburgDepartment of Human Biology, NUTRIM Institute of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, P.O. Box 616, 6200 MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Thorben AussiekerDepartment of Human Biology, NUTRIM Institute of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, P.O. Box 616, 6200 MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Bouke P AdriaansCardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Alfons J H M HoubenDepartment of Internal Medicine, Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Lex B VerdijkDepartment of Human Biology, NUTRIM Institute of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, P.O. Box 616, 6200 MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Luc J C van LoonDepartment of Human Biology, NUTRIM Institute of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, P.O. Box 616, 6200 MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Tim SnijdersDepartment of Human Biology, NUTRIM Institute of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, P.O. Box 616, 6200 MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands. tim.snijders@maastrichtuniversity.nl.ORCID 0000-0002-5874-1245

Funding

Zorgonderzoek Nederland (ZonMw) 016.196.008
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundResistance exercise training is an effective treatment strategy to counteract the age-related loss of muscle mass and strength in older adults. However, there is a large inter-individual variation in muscle fiber hypertrophy following resistance exercise training. It has been hypothesized that a less than optimal muscle fiber capillarization and perfusion capacity may compromise muscle hypertrophy during resistance exercise training in older adults.

objectiveWe assessed whether 8 weeks of aerobic exercise preconditioning, to improve muscle fiber capillarization and perfusion capacity, augments the gains in muscle mass and strength during subsequent resistance exercise training in older adults.

methodsIn total, 34 healthy older males and females (71 years standard deviation (SD) ± 5 years) participated in 12 weeks of progressive resistance exercise training, preceded by either 8 weeks of aerobic preconditioning (AER, n = 17) through cycle-ergometer endurance training, or a no exercise control condition (CON, n = 17). Muscle strength (one repetition maximum (1RM)) and muscle fiber characteristics (histochemistry) were assessed at baseline, following 8 weeks of AER or CON, and after 12 weeks of resistance exercise training. Femoral artery blood flow and vastus lateralis muscle microvascular perfusion kinetics were assessed at baseline and following 8 weeks of AER or CON intervention. Thigh muscle volume (magnetic resonance imaging scan) was assessed before and after the 12 weeks of resistance exercise training.

resultsAerobic exercise preconditioning increased type I (+ 19 ± 19%, P < 0.05) and type II (+ 35 ± 37%, P < 0.05) muscle capillary-to-fiber ratio, with no changes in the CON group (type I: + 0 ± 17%; type II: - 3 ± 26%). Muscle microvascular perfusion following a submaximal resistance exercise stimulus was reduced following aerobic exercise preconditioning, whereas no changes were observed in the CON group (interaction effect, P = 0.051). Resistance exercise training increased leg press 1RM (+ 16 ± 10% versus + 12 ± 8%, respectively, P < 0.001) and thigh muscle volume (+ 0.42 ± 0.69 versus + 0.31 ± 0.62 L, respectively, P < 0.001) in both the AER and CON groups, with no differences between the groups. No differences were observed in type I and type II muscle fiber hypertrophy in response to the entire intervention program between groups (interaction effect, P > 0.5).

conclusionsAerobic exercise preconditioning increases type I and type II muscle fiber capillarization in healthy older adults. Aerobic exercise preconditioning does not further increase muscle hypertrophy during subsequent resistance exercise training in healthy older adults. Both structural and functional microvascular characteristics do not seem to restrict the skeletal muscle adaptive response to resistance-type exercise training in healthy older adults.

Indexed as

ExerciseMuscle, SkeletalQuadriceps MuscleResistance TrainingAgedCapillariesFemaleFemoral ArteryHumansHypertrophyMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMuscle Fibers, SkeletalMuscle StrengthRegional Blood Flow

Identifiers

PMID40266553
PMCPMC12476412

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.