Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40266515›Full record

ReviewMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2025

Making Universal Vaccines and Antibodies Through Glycoengineering.

Larissa Krasnova, Chi-Huey Wong

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Larissa KrasnovaDepartment of Chemistry, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Chi-Huey WongDepartment of Chemistry, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, CA, USA. wong@scripps.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biological glycosylation is a process used by nature to modulate the structure and function of biomolecules, particularly the glycoproteins on the surface of cells. Most human viruses, for example, depend on the host glycosylation machinery to create a sugar coat on the viral surface to facilitate infection and escape immune surveillance. The main immunogens of influenza and COVID viruses are mostly shielded by the sugar coat from immune response, so deletion of the sugar coat would expose the highly conserved epitopes and elicit broadly protective antibody and T cell responses against the virus and different variants. In addition to increased memory T cell response, the antibodies induced by such low-sugar vaccines are more diverse with higher titers against the immunogen, especially the highly conserved epitopes, thus broadening the scope of protection. Furthermore, the Fc-glycans on the antibody can be engineered to improve antibody-mediated killing. This review highlights the impact of glycosylation engineering on the development of universal vaccines and antibodies with improved Fc-mediated killing.

Indexed as

Antibodies, ViralProtein EngineeringAnimalsEpitopesGlycosylationHumansInfluenza VaccinesPolysaccharidesSARS-CoV-2Vaccine DevelopmentAntibodies, ViralEpitopesInfluenza VaccinesPolysaccharidesAntibody glycoengineeringDeletion of sugar coatEffector functionsGlycosylationInfluenza virusLow-sugar vaccinationSARS-CoV-2Universal vaccine

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.