Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40266511›Full record

ReviewCurrent reviews in musculoskeletal medicine2025

Long-Term Results for Meniscus Repair.

Brandon Cabarcas, Emily Peairs, Sanathan Iyer, Jason Ina, Mario Hevesi, Adam J Tagliero, Aaron J Krych

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Brandon CabarcasDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St SW Rochester, Rochester, MN, USA.
Emily PeairsDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St SW Rochester, Rochester, MN, USA.
Sanathan IyerDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St SW Rochester, Rochester, MN, USA.
Jason InaDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St SW Rochester, Rochester, MN, USA.
Mario HevesiDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St SW Rochester, Rochester, MN, USA. Hevesi.Mario@mayo.edu.
Adam J TaglieroDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St SW Rochester, Rochester, MN, USA.
Aaron J KrychDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St SW Rochester, Rochester, MN, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewMeniscus tears are some of the most commonly managed orthopedic injuries that affect a wide variety of patient populations. Traditionally, meniscus tears were treated either conservatively or with partial meniscectomy. However, recent technological innovations have generated a rapid evolution in the modern evaluation and treatment of meniscus tears. The primary objective of this review is to provide a detailed overview of long-term results of meniscus repair after greater than five to ten years follow up, highlighting modern surgical techniques, clinical and radiologic outcomes, rates of failure and revision surgery, as well as emerging insights and future directions. RECENT

findingsAdvancements in arthroscopic implants and techniques helped establish meniscus repair as the preferred approach for treating many meniscal tears due to its ability to preserve native knee kinematics and decrease the risk of osteoarthritic progression. In properly indicated patients, long-term clinical data supports performing meniscus repair over traditional treatments, such as partial meniscectomy, to preserve overall knee function and longevity. The impact of tear morphology on healing rates, potential for biologic augmentation, and optimal postoperative rehabilitation are substantial areas of active research. Undertaking a comprehensive, individualized approach evaluating careful patient selection, sound surgical technique, and ideal rehabilitation strategies is critical to guiding treatment decisions and achieving long-term successful outcomes.

Indexed as

Long-term outcomesMeniscus repairMeniscus tear treatment

Identifiers

PMID40266511
PMCPMC12185851

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.