ArticleChild psychiatry and human development2025
Psychometric Properties of the Metacognitions Questionnaire-30 (MCQ-30) in Older Norwegian Adolescents.
Article in Child psychiatry and human development, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Psychometric properties of the metacognitions questionnaire-30 in Turkish outpatient adolescents.BMC psychology · 2026Article
- Applying metacognitive therapy for generalized anxiety disorder to adolescents: results from an open trial with 3- and 6-months follow-up.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Article
- Decoding personality functioning: the impact of DSM-5 pathological traits mediated by emotion dysregulation and metacognition.Borderline personality disorder and emotion dysregulation · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Dysfunctional metacognitive beliefs have been established as a transdiagnostic correlate of anxiety and depression in adults and are considered a central mechanism of persistent emotional distress according to the metacognitive model of psychological disorders. However, the importance of metacognitions for distress and emotional disorder in adolescence is far less researched, and to investigate this further there is a need for reliable and valid assessment tools. The Metacognitions Questionnaire-30 (MCQ-30) might be a suitable and valid assessment tool in adolescents with the implication that it can be used to research the role of metacognitions in youth mental health and track how metacognitions change and relate to outcomes over time from adolescence to adulthood. We therefore aimed to examine the psychometric properties of the MCQ-30 in an Upper Secondary School-sample of 494 Norwegian adolescents, aged 16- to 18-years old. A confirmatory factor analysis indicated a good fit for the proposed five-factor structure and evidence for measurement invariance was supported across sex and groups of anxiety severity. The factors showed acceptable to good internal consistency and there was support for convergent validity. In conclusion, these findings indicate that the adult version of the MCQ-30 can be applied in Norwegian adolescents from 16-years old.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40266510What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.