Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40266485›Full record

ArticleBrazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology]2025

Effect of different fermentation substrates on rumen microorganisms and microbe-derived extracellular vesicles (EVs).

Rongxia Zhu, Lijun Ou, Tonghao Li, Caiyu Luo, Zecheng Zou, Qien Qi, Xin Feng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology], 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Rongxia Zhu *School of Animal Science and Technology, Foshan University, Foshan, 528000, China.
Lijun Ou *School of Animal Science and Technology, Foshan University, Foshan, 528000, China.
Tonghao Li *School of Animal Science and Technology, Foshan University, Foshan, 528000, China.
Caiyu LuoSchool of Animal Science and Technology, Foshan University, Foshan, 528000, China.
Zecheng ZouSchool of Animal Science and Technology, Foshan University, Foshan, 528000, China.
Qien QiSchool of Animal Science and Technology, Foshan University, Foshan, 528000, China.
Xin FengSchool of Animal Science and Technology, Foshan University, Foshan, 528000, China. 3haofx@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3986-3714

Funding

Foshan University CGZ0400162
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diet composition and microbiota play a crucial role in animal health and productivity. The study aimed to explore the effects of different fermentation substrates on rumen microbiota and their extracellular vesicles (EVs). Straw (fiber), corn starch (starch), and casein (protein) were used as substrates for in vitro fermentation. After 24 h of fermentation, samples were collected and subjected to 16 S rRNA gene sequencing to analyze rumen microbiota. Microbe-derived EVs were extracted and their morphology and particle size were determined. Results showed that fiber increased the diversity of rumen microorganisms, protein increased richness, and starch decreased both diversity and richness of the microbes. Rumen microbiota was dominated by Firmicutes in the protein group, Bacteroidota in the fiber group and Prevotella in the starch group. Principal co-ordinates analysis (PCoA) revealed significant differences in microbial community structure among the three groups. LEfSe analysis at the genus level identified that Prevotella, Succinivibrio, Clostridia_UCG_014 were enriched in the starch group, whereas Acidaminococcus, Muribaculaceae, Pyramidobacter were enriched in the protein group. For the fiber group, the enriched genera included F082 and Rikenellaceae_RC9_gut_group. Phylogenetic investigation of communities by reconstruction of unobserved states (PICRUSt2) analysis showed that the top ten microbial functions were mainly involved in signaling and cellular processes (K06142, K03310, K02030, K06147, K01990, K02004, K01992, K02014) and genetic information processing (K06180, K03088), with the fiber group showing better performance in these processes compared to other two groups. Additionally, the particle sizes of extracellular vesicles ranged from 20 to 400 nm, with an average particle distribution coefficients (PDI) close to 0.3 in each group, indicating uniform particle size. Overall, different fermentation substrates significantly affected the diversity of rumen microbes, without affecting the morphology and particle size of microbial EVs.

Indexed as

BacteriaExtracellular VesiclesGastrointestinal MicrobiomeRumenAnimal FeedAnimalsCattleFermentationPhylogenyRNA, Ribosomal, 16SStarchRNA, Ribosomal, 16SStarchExtracellular vesicleFiberIn vitro fermentationProteinRumen microbiotaStarch

Identifiers

PMID40266485
PMCPMC12095833

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.