ArticleUpdates in surgery2025
Sphincter-preserving total fistulectomy with resection of the anoderm and skin and intersphincteric space closure for anal fistula.
Article in Updates in surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Sphincter-preserving total fistulectomy: promising outcomes but questions remain.Updates in surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Non-cure, recurrence and faecal incontinence have often been a major challenge in patients after surgical treatment for anal fistula. To overcome these problems, we have developed a sphincter-preserving total fistulectomy procedure involving resection of the anoderm and skin with intersphincteric space closure (TFRAS). The purpose of the present study was to evaluate this TFRAS technique. TFRAS was performed in 618 patients. The method involved excision of the anoderm and skin, including the internal opening, total removal of the fistula tract while preserving the sphincter, closure of the resulting intersphincteric space and open wound. The Parks classification was used, and subcutaneous, supralevatoric, and unclassifiable fistulas not included in this classification were newly defined and evaluated. The postoperative cure rate was 97.7% and the recurrence rate was 0.7%. The non-cure rate was significantly higher for supralevatoric fistulas and the recurrence rate was significantly higher for unclassifiable fistulas. No cases of postoperative solid faecal incontinence were observed, and the faecal incontinence rate was 0.7%. The mean postoperative Cleveland Clinic Faecal Incontinence (CCFI) score was 0.9, and the highest value of 8 was observed in only one case. No significant differences were found between the classifications based on faecal incontinence rates and the CCFI score. There was no significant difference in CCFI score between patients who underwent TFRAS at only one site and those who did so at two or more sites. TFRAS is considered a useful technique for anal fistulas, offering a high cure rate, a low recurrence rate, and no severe postoperative faecal incontinence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40266474What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.