Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40266470›Full record

GuidelineEuropean archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry2025

Best clinical practise guidance for oral health care management of long-term childhood cancer survivors (CCS): an EAPD policy document.

K Seremidi, S Gizani, M Anderson, G Dahllöf, M Barr-Agholme, S Parekh, G Tsilingaridis, European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry (EAPD)

Abstract readPractice Guideline
In one paragraph

Guideline in European archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

K SeremidiDepartment Paediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athnes, Greece.
S GizaniDepartment Paediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athnes, Greece.
M AndersonDepartment of Pediatric Dentistry, Public Dental Service, Eastman Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
G DahllöfDivision of Paediatric Dentistry, Department of Dental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, 14104, Huddinge, Sweden.
M Barr-AgholmeDivision of Paediatric Dentistry, Department of Dental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, 14104, Huddinge, Sweden.
S ParekhDepartment of Paediatric Dentistry, UCL Eastman Dental Institute, London, UK.
G TsilingaridisDivision of Paediatric Dentistry, Department of Dental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, 14104, Huddinge, Sweden. georgios.tsilingaridis@ki.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5361-5840
European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry (EAPD)

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry (EAPD) has developed this best clinical practice guidance to help clinicians manage the oral health of long-term childhood cancer survivors.

methodsAn expert group conducted a systematic review of the relevant literature on oral health care management of long-term childhood cancer survivors (CCS). The workshop was held during the corresponding EAPD interim seminar in Prague in May 2023. Several clinical based recommendations and statements were agreed upon, and gaps in our knowledge were identified.

resultsThe evidence regarding prevalence was limited to retrospective studies of moderate to good quality. Oral hygiene of CCS was worse compared to healthy individuals, showing higher values for gingival and plaque indices. Similarly, survivors had increased caries risk with higher mean dmft/DMFT and dt/DT values. The most common radiographic defects were impaired root growth in the permanent teeth and tooth agenesis. Enamel developmental defects, microdontia, and hypodontia were also commonly diagnosed. Age at start of treatment was identified as a risk factor, for the development of microdontia, tooth agenesis, and root defects in patients treated at age <3 years. The type of treatment also appeared to influence the risk, as an increased prevalence of dental caries and a higher frequency of root malformations were found in patients who had undergone concomitant radiation therapy, although evidence was limited. Treatment duration was not found to be a risk factor.

conclusionThese guidelines provide recommendations for dental management for childhood cancer survivors defined as children and adolescents up to the age of 19 years, regardless of age at initial diagnosis and treatment initiation.

Indexed as

Cancer SurvivorsOral HealthChildDental CariesEuropeHumansSystematic Reviews as TopicChildhood cancer survivorsDental managementLate dental effectsOral health care

Identifiers

PMID40266470
PMCPMC12283843

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.