ArticleJournal of cancer survivorship : research and practice2025
Decisions of young women with breast cancer regarding fertility preservation before cancer treatment and family building after treatment.
Article in Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Fertility in breast cancer survivorship: a scoping review.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2026Review
- Counseling and use of surrogacy among cancer survivors (CUSACS).Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2026Article
- The role of patient age in fertility preservation among women with breast cancer: biological mechanisms and clinical implications.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2026Review
- Fertility and ovarian function preservation in young women with breast cancer: A joint analysis of the Joven & Fuerte and PREFER prospective studies.Breast (Edinburgh, Scotland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeApproximately 19% of breast cancer cases in 2020 were diagnosed in women under age 50. These premenopausal women with early-stage breast cancer face unique challenges related to family building. This study examines the decision-making and outcomes of patients who pursue fertility preservation before treatment and family building afterwards.
methodsBreast cancer survivors seen by a fertility nurse specialist before initiating cancer treatment at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) between 2009 and 2017 were contacted to participate. Participants completed a web-based cross-sectional survey examining decisions made about fertility preservation, factors influencing them, and post-treatment reflections and outcomes.
resultsPrior to treatment, 168 women met with a reproductive endocrinologist and 116 underwent fertility preservation. After completing cancer treatment, 36 women had children and 15 of these women used eggs/embryos frozen prior to treatment. The majority of women deemed these factors "very important" when deciding whether to freeze eggs/embryos: a desire to have a biologic child, the ability to feel hopeful about their future, the chance of success, feeling overwhelmed by their diagnosis, and concerns about having regret if they didn't freeze their eggs/embryo.
conclusionsOver half of patients who attempted family building after treatment were able to have children. Many of these women used eggs/embryos frozen before treatment either by getting pregnant themselves or via surrogacy. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: This data stresses the importance of referring cancer patients early to a reproductive endocrinologist before initiation of systemic therapy and has high translational promise in the clinical care of all young female cancer survivors interested in fertility preservation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40266447What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.