Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40266444›Full record

ArticleTherapeutic innovation & regulatory science2025

Assessing the Value of Integrated Evidence Approaches in Drug Development.

Joseph A DiMasi, Melvin Skip Olson, Zachary Smith, Kenneth A Getz, Gorana Capkun

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. The value of evidence and its role in driving product strategy.Journal of comparative effectiveness research · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Joseph A DiMasi *Tufts Center for the Study of Drug Development, Tufts University, 145 Harrison Avenue, Boston, MA, 02111, USA. joseph.dimasi@tufts.edu.
Melvin Skip Olson *Olson Strategies GmbH, Allschwil, Switzerland.
Zachary SmithTufts Center for the Study of Drug Development, Tufts University, 145 Harrison Avenue, Boston, MA, 02111, USA.
Kenneth A GetzTufts Center for the Study of Drug Development, Tufts University, 145 Harrison Avenue, Boston, MA, 02111, USA.
Gorana CapkunMerck Healthcare KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe use of Integrated Evidence Plans (IEPs) by the pharmaceutical industry has expanded in recent years with the aim of optimizing healthcare and patient outcomes. The evidence base of IEPs goes beyond traditional randomized controlled trials to provide holistic evidence suitable for all stakeholders and allows for consideration of different packages in different regions. However, this approach to drug development is not systematically adopted by all sponsors because of perceived uncertainty in its investment value.

methodsWe introduce the concept of value drivers to which we apply an expected net present value (eNPV) model of the cash flows for drug development and commercialization. The approach is outlined for two, typical, hypothetical lifecycle management IEPs. The measure of IEP value is defined as the increment in eNPV that occurs when IE programs are employed in comparison to when they are not.

resultsWe found substantial value for IEPs. One example incorporated a plan to conduct an observational study that could be used as a basis for approval in lieu of a classical phase II trial for a supplemental indication. In the other example, increased adoption of the new treatment leads to a highly positive increment in eNPV based on the critical evidence generated in a phase IIIb study.

conclusionsUse of value drivers and eNPV-based value models when planning for IEPs can provide objective guidance for project teams. The value can be estimated through formal economic analysis that considers planned timelines, R&D costs, estimates of the likelihood of regulatory approval, patient access and clinical adoption if development is successful.

Indexed as

Drug DevelopmentDrug IndustryEvidence-Based MedicineHumansClinical development phasesExpected net present valueIntegrated evidenceStrategic decision makingValue of evidence

Identifiers

PMID40266444
PMCPMC12181097

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.