Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40266437›Full record

ReviewCurrent treatment options in oncology2025

PSMA-based Therapies and Novel Therapies in Advanced Prostate Cancer: The Now and the Future.

Ann Ayzman, Russell K Pachynski, Melissa A Reimers

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current treatment options in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ann AyzmanDepartment of Internal Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis, 660 S. Euclid Ave, Campus, Box 8056, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA.
Russell K PachynskiDivision of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis, 660 S. Euclid Ave, Campus, Box 8056, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA.
Melissa A ReimersDivision of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis, 660 S. Euclid Ave, Campus, Box 8056, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA. mreimers@wustl.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

opinion statementThe treatment landscape for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) is rapidly evolving with the advent of PSMA-targeted radioligand therapies (RLTs) and bispecific T-cell engagers (BiTEs). These novel approaches provide new hope for patients who have progressed on standard therapies. However, their full clinical potential will be realized only by addressing key challenges, including tumor heterogeneity, resistance mechanisms, immune-related toxicities, and the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment. Additionally, the optimal sequencing of these therapies at different stages of disease remains an open question. While most of these interventions are currently introduced in late-stage, heavily pretreated patients, ongoing clinical trials are exploring their role in earlier disease settings, where they may be more effective in altering the natural history of disease. PSMA-based RLTs, such as 177Lu-PSMA- 617, have demonstrated promising efficacy, particularly in patients with high PSMA expression. However, the presence of PSMA-negative or heterogeneous tumors necessitates the development of additional biomarkers and combination strategies. The ongoing PSMAddition trial may establish RLTs as an earlier-line treatment in hormone-sensitive metastatic prostate cancer, potentially shifting the standard of care. Moreover, mitigating toxicities through radioprotective agents may aid in expanding their clinical utility. BiTE therapies offer a different but complementary mechanism of action, leveraging T-cell engagement to drive tumor cell destruction. While cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immunogenicity remain significant hurdles, modifications such as low-affinity CD3 binding and optimized dosing regimens are showing promise. The potential synergy of BiTEs with immune checkpoint inhibitors and tumor microenvironment-modulating agents should be further explored to enhance therapeutic efficacy. Given these advancements, the future of mCRPC treatment likely lies in a personalized, multimodal approach that integrates PSMA-based RLTs, BiTEs, and complementary therapies at earlier disease stages. Strategic biomarker-driven patient selection and combination regimens will be essential in optimizing outcomes while minimizing resistance and toxicity.

Indexed as

Antigens, SurfaceGlutamate Carboxypeptidase IIProstatic NeoplasmsProstatic Neoplasms, Castration-ResistantBiomarkers, TumorCombined Modality TherapyHumansMaleMolecular Targeted TherapyNeoplasm StagingRadiopharmaceuticalsTreatment OutcomeTumor MicroenvironmentAntigens, SurfaceBiomarkers, TumorFOLH1 protein, humanGlutamate Carboxypeptidase IIRadiopharmaceuticalsAntibody–drug conjugateBispecific T-cell engagerMetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancerProstate-specific membrane antigenRadioligand therapy

Identifiers

PMID40266437
PMCPMC12055665

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.