ArticleLangenbeck's archives of surgery2025
The impact of indocyanine green on tumor visualization and procedural adjustment in minimally invasive liver surgery.
Article in Langenbeck's archives of surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical practice of indocyanine green fluorescence imaging in robotic liver surgery - a global expert survey.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Global bibliometric analysis of molecular imaging-guided robotic-assisted surgery: publication dynamics, thematic evolution, authorship patterns, and disciplinary landscape development (1982-2025).Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Article
- Real-time image-guided and computer augmented reality in minimally invasive hepatopancreatobiliary surgery cutting edge technology transforming HPB surgery.Surgical endoscopy · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMinimally invasive hepatobiliary surgery is performed increasingly either with robotic assistance or conventional laparoscopy. The lack of haptic feedback is one of the main challenges which has to be addressed during these procedures. Especially in oncological minimally invasive liver surgery Indocyanine green (ICG) can help to gain additional information for improved oncological quality.
methodsPatients who underwent minimally invasive liver surgery for liver tumors between 01/2019 and 09/2022 and matched the study criteria were selected from the Magdeburg Registry of Minimally invasive liver surgery (MD-MILS). Patient demographics, tumor characteristics and perioperative data were analyzed retrospectively. The benefit of ICG for tumor identification and the resection procedure was assessed as 'very helpful', 'helpful' and 'not helpful' depending on the surgeon´s estimation.
resultsSeventy-two patients who met the selection criteria were included in the analysis. Of these, 49 patients received ICG for intraoperative tumor visualization (ICG). Twenty-three patients with comparable demographics did not receive ICG and served as comparison group (nICG). A total of 69.4% robotic and 30.6% laparoscopic procedures were performed. In the ICG group procedural adjustments were significantly more frequent intraoperatively (p = 0.023). Intraoperative frozen section analysis on additional biopsies of ICG positive lesions were performed in 37% in the ICG group. In the nICG group suspect lesions, identified by ultrasound, went to frozen section in 17% (p = 0.006). Histopathological tumor positivity was identified in 12.2% in the ICG cohort vs no tumor positivity in the nICG cohort. This was one factor which led to the termination of surgery in 8% in the ICG vs the nICG 4.3% group (p = 0.485). In 88% intraoperative ICG visualization was scored as "helpful" when injected on preoperative day 4-7 with respect to the liver parenchyma structure and hepatocellular function.
conclusionICG can improve oncological quality in minimally invasive liver resections. It provides additional visual information which can help to compensate the loss of haptics and tumor identification during liver tissue palpation. The intraoperative use of ICG was associated with no adverse events and did not prolong operative time. We recommend its routine use during minimally invasive liver surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.